Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- From: "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 23:22:39 GMT
"solar plexus" <r384923hr823h28eh@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1115593790.920013.304560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Without wishing to give credence to the idea of mass >increase I am
> not so
> >sure historically its introduction had anything to with an >aether.
>
> fine, now that we know what you think
> (as somebody might be interested)
>
> where are your comments to the post?
You mean comments like: 'if thay put you behind bars, you'll become
everybody's bitche prettyboy, bwahahahaha... now explain us why the planets
rotate and
revolves and dont come back with that kind of "jesus loves you" posts, shut
the *** up if have nothen to say, foool.'
Genuine posters have a different standard of what constitutes comments than
you obviously do.
Bill
.
- References:
- Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- From: Baugh
- Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- From: Bill Hobba
- Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- Prev by Date: Re: black hole is an oximoron
- Next by Date: Re: Two photons... relative distance question
- Previous by thread: Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- Next by thread: Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- Index(es):