Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed

"John C. Polasek" <jpolasek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ljjs71t4atfh8rs62k21th7p3fhepp782a@xxxxxxxxxx
[snip]

| I have no idea what you are grumbling about. I have put up 11 papers,
| exposing myself to all manner of contradiction, yet not one peep of
| any substance have I heard, .

Hmm... Guess I don't count. ;-) Well, let's try to get back to
physics here anywise.

| This #10 paper that shows the properties of Espace' primal cell,
| derives new fundamental constants like lambda and omega that allow
| definiton of eps0 and mu0 as secondary constants, has shown the
| angular momentum is alpha x h, and the magnetic moment to be 4pi x the
| Bohr magneton, etc. Besides which as I have shown in #1, the bulk
| modulus Y (derived from K) and rho combine for a transmission
| velocity of c.

None of this is really that extraordinary if you ask me. You still
haven't made the complete mathematical connection from eps0 to max
force. Now that would be extraordinary; at least to me.

| Now how is it exactly that you want me to act credibly?

You're doing OK. Keep at it and hopefully your credibility will get
better. I have the same problem as you as far as getting good feedback.
I am not sure if it is that some people just don't know what to think
about it or what. But to be more credible, ya have to try to work in
some of the better feedback to approve your approach. With our quantum
"vacuum" charge concept, we don't go around saying the Standard Model or
QED or QCD or GR or SR is screwed up or that our ideas replace them. We
try to use those aspects to improve our concept(s) whenever possible.
There is literally mountains of evidence that current theory is
accurate. Some of the concepts may still be a bit cranky but it is OK
to be a bit cranky. Most new ideas are like that. Even from
physicists. But ya got to try to stay closer to mainstream physics if
you want to try to "sell" your ideas to them.

Again, my advice is to show that GR is emergent from the DS concept
(mathematically). Seems to me that you are much more than half-way
there. Why not try to take it the rest of the way? Ya got nothing to
lose and everything to gain. Then once that is out of the way, you can
say; "by the way, this DS concept can also explain this or that." That
in turn might lead someone to find a solution of GR that matches, thus
further confirming DS. This is the path I am going to try to take.
Just seems more credible to me.

Just from my few short months of studying GR more intensely, I can
easily see that it is an extremely rich concept. I am pretty sure that
it ought to cover most all of classical physics. And there is not much
doubt in my mind that the DS concept is the bridge for GR to be able to
cover quantum concepts also. Volovik and other physicists think so, so
that is good enough for me to proceed with research about it. For us it
is simple, the quantum "vacuum" charge concept does not work correctly
at all without the DS concept. So I am highly interested to help make
the DS concept as credible as possible.

FrediFizzx

http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Properties of the quantum vacuum or Espace nicely meshed
    ... | physics here anywise. ... Keep at it and hopefully your credibility will get ... | cover quantum concepts also. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: publishing problems (physics)
    ... but the papers had already passed through the preliminary ... "Classical and Quantum Gravity welcomes articles on experimental ... branches of gravitational physics and the theory of spacetime. ...
    (uk.business.agriculture)
  • Re: moment of inertia of a cube
    ... on all past papers - but if I can do it during an exam only time will tell. ... A to get to reduced row echelon form, ... Interestingly most students seem not to be math majors - mostly physics, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PEER/PUBLISHED
    ... Hammond calling someone else a crackpot. ... > few of the PhD's in Physics, ... although his webpage is pretty detailed, ... > papers on RELATIVITY including several papers by himself ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PEER/PUBLISHED
    ... Hammond calling someone else a crackpot. ... > few of the PhD's in Physics, ... although his webpage is pretty detailed, ... > papers on RELATIVITY including several papers by himself ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast