Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.

Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> comments:

In SR, in any and all inertial frames, the tools
placed in that inertial frame will do the following:
Any object that moves in that inertial reference
frame will be measured, by the SR tools being used in
that frame, to be shortened along the direction of
its motion in that frame.
Any clock that moves in that inertial reference
frame will be measured, by the SR tools being used in
that frame, to have a lower rate.
These facts are fixed and unalterable. They are
also the same facts that would occur in LET.

SR and LET make the identical predictions. LET
says that the above will be measured. Therefore, SR
has to measure the identical things! It cannot be
different. LET says that what is measured is all
measured in simple 3-D! And guess what, SR is not
able to refute or to deny this. SR also is making
its measurements, with the SR tools being used,
exactly as done in LET, in a simple 3-D manner.
You can talk all you want about your 4-D, and your
math where you project, and you perspectives. And
you can even get correct answers. But you are
fooling yourselves if you think that the doing of
things in the manner you are doing them, means that
reality is doing what you are doing. LET says that
simple 3-D gets you the identical answers, and it
does. And there are no reasons at all why reality is
any different than that!
Just in case you did not understand what was just
said, there is no scientific evidence that can be
produced that 4-D was actually involved. It is only
a math way to relate all your variables, and
physically there was no need at all to do it that
way. You can believe it, but you cannot produce any
evidence. You are only fooling yourselves. Shame on
you all!

Thanks for reading.
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>
+ Remove 3 dots for e-mail.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The physical paradox of the twins.
    ... ghytrfvbnmju7654@mail.com (Jim Black) wrote: ... Gerald L. O'Barr wrote: ... >Then how do you show, physically, which frame it is? ... terms of any and all measurements, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
    ... original paper on special relativity titled "On the Electrodynamics ... other frame there is a real life experiment where the ... This is not much of a physics experiment since ... Sticking to inertial frames, the length of a rod is measured to be ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Another Rotating Cylinder Problem - explain from moving frame view
    ... original paper on special relativity titled "On the Electrodynamics ... other frame there is a real life experiment where the ... This is not much of a physics experiment since ... Sticking to inertial frames, the length of a rod is measured to be ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: OBarr: Changes in lengths and rates are real!
    ... regarding two inertial frames. ... non-inertially moving clock. ... when the solar frame is used, ... relation with its time rate referred to that frame. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Frame
    ... "When the physics or geometry of a situation being studied suggests ... some preferred inertial frame (e.g. the frame in which some piece of ... The principle of relativity states that Every ... two different inertial frames must obtain identically the same ...
    (sci.physics)