Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.

Gerald L. O'Barr:

>O'Barr comments:
> The claims I make, I have both referenced and
>posted. LET establishes the exact same final math as
>SR.

And I asked you to support that statement. Either you can or you
can't. If you can't, stop making that statement.

>LET is the correct physical base upon which SR
>math is based. Once this has been established, then
>everything done in the name of SR is due to LET, pure
>and simple.

If you know that to be true, then you can prove that it is true.
If you can't prove that statement, then you can't possibly know
whether it's true or false.

> I do not know everything. I cannot do everything
>that has been done in the name of SR.

Then you should confine your comments to only that which you
know instead of making statements you can't prove.

>But if the
>math of SR has been connected to its proper base,
>then all of what SR has done is now connected to LET.
>I have done what needs to be done. Your acceptance
>of this is up to you, but you have no call upon me to
>do more. If you want to refute me, then take it by
>the numbers:

> Do you disagree that LET establishes the same math
>as SR?

Yes, I disagree.

>By the way, I have never heard you say one
>way or the other! Why is that? What is so hard for
>you to say simple truths, that the math of these two
>theories are the same?
> Do you disagree that LET makes the same math
>predictions as SR?

Yes, I disagree.

>By the way, I have never heard
>you say one way or the other on this? Why is that?
>What is it that makes it so hard for you to say such
>simple and obvious things?
> Do you disagree that LET is a physical based
>theory, and SR has no physical base.

Yes, I disagree. Now, try to prove me wrong on
each of these.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: abundance of irrationals!)
    ... >> If TO can't hack math, nobody is forcing him into it. ... > upon close strutiny are inherently inconsistent, ... As to the reality of mathematics, I take a moderately Platonic view. ... I do not disagree. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: wtf? ( aka They are dancing in the streets in Kenya tonight )
    ... Feel free to disagree but appreciate that you're ... not in the plurality. ... but it DOES have to do with politics. ... Given that I teach math you should understand and appreciate that faculty ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Long threads, tactics
    ... > its way around the world, as I move Google search results. ... > of an electronic math journal. ... If you disagree, please say why. ... whereas you are an Amateur. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
    ... >Bilge wrote: ... LET establishes the exact same final math as ... LET is the correct physical base upon which SR ... Do you disagree that LET establishes the same math ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: I was right, surrogate factoring proof
    ... >> factoring with a couple of quadratics and solutions for x and z, ... Mathematical proof is what matters. ... If you disagree, show a false step. ... Can you do math, or are you just someone disagreeing to be ...
    (sci.crypt)