Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- From: Baugh <baconbaugh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 08:27:30 -0400
Gerald L. O'Barr wrote:
SR and LET make the identical predictions.
Then your "LET" is SR, or likely your own pet model for the theory.
I'll post a new thread describing the difference between "theory" and "model".
Regards, James Baugh .
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- From: Baugh
- Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- Prev by Date: Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- Next by Date: Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
- Previous by thread: Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- Next by thread: Re: Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.
- Index(es):
