Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.

Harry:
>
>"Bilge" <dubious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:slrnd7u0ik.5c.dubious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>SNIP
>
>> > Do you disagree that LET establishes the same math
>> > as SR?
>>
>> Yes, I disagree.
>
>That's obviously a key issue. I really wonder what other math could be
>established using Poincare's PoR of 1904 together with his Lorentz
>transformations of 1905.

You could always attempt the exercise I gave you and o'barnacle and
find out.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: abundance of irrationals!)
    ... >> If TO can't hack math, nobody is forcing him into it. ... > upon close strutiny are inherently inconsistent, ... As to the reality of mathematics, I take a moderately Platonic view. ... I do not disagree. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: wtf? ( aka They are dancing in the streets in Kenya tonight )
    ... Feel free to disagree but appreciate that you're ... not in the plurality. ... but it DOES have to do with politics. ... Given that I teach math you should understand and appreciate that faculty ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Long threads, tactics
    ... > its way around the world, as I move Google search results. ... > of an electronic math journal. ... If you disagree, please say why. ... whereas you are an Amateur. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
    ... LET establishes the exact same final math as ... >LET is the correct physical base upon which SR ... know instead of making statements you can't prove. ... Yes, I disagree. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
    ... SNIP ... >> Do you disagree that LET establishes the same math ... I really wonder what other math could be ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)