Re: light as standing wave

From: "rotchm@xxxxxxxxx" <rotchm@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 13 May 2005 20:35:46 -0700

Not a requirement.

The usual "standing wave" can be described as the sum of two
propagating functions (as in physics textbooks).

However, it does not need to be described as so...

.

References:
- light as standing wave
  - From: ray
- Re: light as standing wave
  - From: Harry

Prev by Date: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
Next by Date: Re: Measuring density of universe
Previous by thread: Re: light as standing wave
Next by thread: Re: Some bad news for Aleksandar Vukelja (I think)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread