Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 09:46:09 -0700
Dear Curious:
"Curious" <anthonyroseuk-curious@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1116087528.136387.38710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dirk vdm wrote:
>> I answered this question on that other thread.
>> Replace u with c and you have your answer.
> Why would the velocity of particle B have
> anything to do with its position in Frame 2
> relative to Frame 1 at a fixed moment?
Why would you assume that you can do any more than measure where
particle B is? There is still this insistance on your part that
"fixed moment" (or any other absolute) has some observable
property that all observers can agree on *now*. Other than c
(aka. local properties), not in this Universe.
David A. Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- References:
- relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Prev by Date: Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Next by Date: Re: Measuring density of universe
- Previous by thread: Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Next by thread: Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|