Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: ande452@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 22:31:13 -0700
Randy M. Dumse wrote:
>
> "Koobee Wublee" <kublai@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:lOAie.41853$fx3.11833@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > No, the deflection of the photon is an abstract concept that can only
> > be proven in the mechanism of mathematics.
>
> While it can only be proven mathematically, there is nothing in
> classical physics that can't be understood intuitively, and intuition
> gives guidance to overview of the math.
>
You're both wrong. Deflection of a photon can never be proven
by math. But the point of physics is to do experiments that
can disprove theories. Nothing can be proven by math or experiments.
Experiments disprove threories or support them.
John Anderson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- References:
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Prev by Date: Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
- Next by Date: Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- Previous by thread: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Next by thread: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|