Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- From: Aristotle <wandering_philosopher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 02:54:18 GMT
Paul,
Arguing with Henri is futile. I have studied his rants...errr
writings, and its clear he has some mental malfunction. He produsec
no math to support his arguments or publishes papers in ANY reputable
journal. I think its best to just ignore him and let him live in his
own little world. We can never teach him the error of his ways
because in his mind he has made no error. Despite all the experiments
that prove his theories wrong nor all the technology that works
perfectly on these supposedly erroneous theories.
Aristotle the Wanderer
.
- References:
- Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- Prev by Date: Re: relative motion and aging
- Next by Date: Re: how cells time accomodate in order to respect relativity priciples?
- Previous by thread: Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- Next by thread: Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- Index(es):