Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: dubious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bilge)
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 16:13:56 GMT
John Kennaugh:
>In message <slrnd8si46.5p.dubious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bilge
><dubious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
>> John Kennaugh:
>> >Paul Stowe writes
>> >>
>> >> Harry, As you can see (as if you didn't already know), Bozo
>> >> the Bile wiggles & squirms (like the worm he is) but rarely
>> >> says anything of substance. But, hey, at least he's living
>> >> up to his self appointed handle... it IS nothing but Bilge
>> >> that spouts forth from his postings here.
>> >>
>> >> In the end, as can be seen here, the only dunce moron was
>> >> Bilge. An idiot savant at best. He has never even directly
>> >> addressed the issue, instead, as is usual, he attempted
>> >> deliberate mis-direction.
>> >>
>> >> Let it go, he is so duplicitous & disingenuous as to make it
>> >> simply impractical to deal with him in any reasonable
>> >> civilized manner.
>> >
>> >I have a feeling Harry is right when he says to Bilge:
>> >
>> >"I have the strong impression that you try to fool people (maybe first
>> >of all yourself?)"
>> >
>> >Bilge protesteth too much. I detect a deep underlying insecurity.
>> >Leaping on posts and hurling abuse is his way of reassuring himself -
>> >casting out devils. The devils are in his own head. They are the doubts
>> >he had to suppress to gain acceptance in his younger days.
>>
>> Don't quit your day job for a career in psychoanalysis, either.
>
>Be assured I have no intention of doing so.
>
>I am no expert on cars but if one is making strange noises even a laymen
>can rightly conclude that there is something wrong. I might make an
>educated guess that it might be the gearbox but it is only a guess and
>even if in the right ball park I would not know how to rectify it.
You aren't an expert on anything but bad analogies and quote mining
snippits of text you can misconstrue into a semantics argument.
>Likewise me and Harry may be able to spot that there is something
>obviously wrong in your case.
But, you and harry are both kooks. If you think something is wrong,
then obviously it isn't.
> We may guess that your problem is
>underlying insecurity over compensated for by apparent delusions of
>grandeur but it would only be a guess on our part
And not a very good one, either. If anyone has delusions of
grandeur, it would be you and harry. Neither of you has ever
studied reativity. Neither of you knows enough about the subject
to solve the simplest physical problem. Indeed, you don't even
know any basic classical physics. Yet both of you have delusions
that you're experts on the subject. You and harry need to read,
http://www.phule.net/mirrors/unskilled-and-unaware.html
and let sink in thefact that you are quintessential examples of
the subject of that article.
> and we could not help
>you sort your problem even if the guess was correct. Sorry I can't help.
>I suggest you consult a good professional.
Don't quit your day job for a career in psychoanalysis.
.
- References:
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: Bilge
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: Bilge
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: Bilge
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: Harry
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: Bilge
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: harry
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: Bilge
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: Bilge
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- Prev by Date: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Next by Date: Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- Previous by thread: Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- Next by thread: Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|