Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: "Koobee Wublee" <kublai@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 10:46:05 -0700
"Gene McGraw" <emcgraw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:428f5917.156580812@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, 19 May 2005 "Koobee Wublee" wrote:
>> what I have done is to disprove the actual prediction done originally
>> by Einstein himself. So, although GR predicts a deflection of a photon
>> due to the curvature of spacetime, the deflection is not what is widely
>> believed to be.
>
> One derivation of the relativistic deflection of light is given on
> this web page: http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-03/6-03.htm
> Are you saying this derivation (not to mention all the others that
> arrive at the same result) is mathematically incorrect?
Why don't you read a few of my older posts in this thread. Exactly where
Einsten went wrong is explained in those. You want to focus on the
integration limit.
>>GR's predicion of Mercury's orbital anomaly is totally bogus. If you are
>>genuinely interested, I can show you how Einstein (assumng he was the
>>original clown to come up with this nonsense) went wrong.
>
> A derivation of the relativistic precession of Mercury's orbit is
> given on this web page http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-02/6-02.htm
> Again, are you saying this is mathematically incorrect?
Yes, you can focus on these two integration constants that are the
by-product of the two conserved quantifies according to Noether's Theorem
(between equation 4 and 5).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Gene McGraw
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- References:
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: ande452
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Gene McGraw
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Prev by Date: Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
- Next by Date: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Previous by thread: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Next by thread: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|