Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- From: "Koobee Wublee" <kublai@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 10:51:28 -0700
"Bilge" <dubious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnd8sp5h.5p.dubious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Koobee Wublee:
>
> >
> >Now, another mystery deals with the temperature of an enclosed bubble of
> >air
> >in vacuum. According to the 1st law of thermodynamics, energy must be
> >conserved. However, due to black body radiation, the temperature will
> >slowly decrease. So, what is the mechanism to allow this bubble of air
> >to
> >lose 20 degrees C in a few hours?
>
> Radiation.
That type?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- From: Paul Cardinale
- Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- From: Bilge
- Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- Prev by Date: Re: A dumb question about time..
- Next by Date: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Previous by thread: Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- Next by thread: Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
