Re: Bending of light not well authenticated

On Sat, 21 May 2005 "Koobee Wublee" wrote:
>> One derivation of the relativistic deflection of light is given on
>> this web page: http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-03/6-03.htm
>> Are you saying this derivation (not to mention all the others that
>> arrive at the same result) is mathematically incorrect?
>Why don't you read a few of my older posts in this thread. Exactly where
>Einsten went wrong is explained in those. You want to focus on the
>integration limit.

I'm afraid I wouldn't know where to begin to look. You've posted quite
a few messages here. Could I trouble you to cut and paste the relevant
explanation into your reply?

>> A derivation of the relativistic precession of Mercury's orbit is
>> given on this web page http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-02/6-02.htm
>> Again, are you saying this is mathematically incorrect?
>Yes, you can focus on these two integration constants that are the
>by-product of the two conserved quantifies according to Noether's Theorem
>(between equation 4 and 5).

Suggesting where I can "focus" is not exactly the same as providing an
explanation of the mathematical error. Can you provide the actual
explanation?
.