Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: "Koobee Wublee" <kublai@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 22:02:23 -0700
"Gene McGraw" <emcgraw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:428f757a.6690593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>>Why don't you read a few of my older posts in this thread. Exactly where
>>Einsten went wrong is explained in those. You want to focus on the
>>integration limit.
>
> I'm afraid I wouldn't know where to begin to look. You've posted quite
> a few messages here. Could I trouble you to cut and paste the relevant
> explanation into your reply?
Use this post to start.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/acedaca7f86be268?dmode=source&hl=en
>>> A derivation of the relativistic precession of Mercury's orbit is
>>> given on this web page http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-02/6-02.htm
>>> Again, are you saying this is mathematically incorrect?
>>Yes, you can focus on these two integration constants that are the
>>by-product of the two conserved quantifies according to Noether's Theorem
>>(between equation 4 and 5).
>
> Suggesting where I can "focus" is not exactly the same as providing an
> explanation of the mathematical error. Can you provide the actual
> explanation?
Let's talk about this one later after you have understood how a photon
deflects under the concept of GR.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Gene McGraw
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- References:
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: ande452
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Gene McGraw
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- From: Gene McGraw
- Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Prev by Date: Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Next by Date: Re: why people pretend that the moon landing was for real
- Previous by thread: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Next by thread: Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|