Re: A dumb question about time..
- From: Andreas Höss <giordano.bruno@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 16:48:19 +0200
Thank you for the link. I have to read him first in order to answer.
kenseto wrote:
> "Andreas Höss" <giordano.bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:428F4E7F.E4F505F3@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > ...what is it?
> > Sorry to bother you but this really is driving me crazy, and maybe
> > somebody has an answer for me.
> > I we know that time is a condition of the time-space construct,
> > but isnt it kind of unique in this respekt by having a direction?
> > What makes me really curiose is the fact that in neuroscience it is well
> > be possible to "switch off" timesensation completely, leaving the person
> > timeless.
> > Is time real, or just a kind of interpretation of something totally
> > different.
> >
> > And if it is so, is it just our interpretation or our invention?
>
> The only time exists is absolute time. A clock second will contain a
> specific amount of absolute time in a specific state of absolute motion of
> the clock. What this mean is that a clock second will contain a different
> amount of absolute time in different states of absolute motion (different
> frames). This is the reason why the speed of light is a defined constant
> math ratio in all inertial frames as follows:
> Light path length of rod (299,792,458m)/the absolute time content for a
> clock second co-moving with the rod.
> Look up Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) in the following link for a more
> detail explanation of this concept for time.
> http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/NPApaper.pdf
>
> Ken Seto
>
> Ken Seto
.
- References:
- A dumb question about time..
- From: Andreas Höss
- Re: A dumb question about time..
- From: kenseto
- A dumb question about time..
- Prev by Date: Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
- Next by Date: Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- Previous by thread: Re: A dumb question about time..
- Next by thread: Lorentz contraction.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
