Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: "Curious" <anthonyroseuk-curious@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 May 2005 10:07:08 -0700
I see. Can one say though that time is not dilating so much as the
clock is showing time dilation?
In other words, the clock's processes are affected by its speed but
time remains absolute THEREFORE the clock shows time dilation.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- References:
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Prev by Date: Re: Lorentz contraction.
- Next by Date: Re: Comparisons between SR and LET.
- Previous by thread: Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Next by thread: Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|