Re: relative motion and aging

To Ghost

I am enjoying my short visit back to the relativity forum and I am in
no way put about by the relativistic myths fabricated on Newtonian
definitions of time,space and motion and your adherence to these
things,again,Dirk stands a better chance of comprehending the
Newton/Flamsteed error which combines axial and orbital motion into a
sidereal calendrical average that works off the Earth's axis.Don't
worry about it,it is out of your league .

As for the relationship between the astronomical motions of the Earth
and the evolution of terrestial surface features through plate movement
on one side and the changing relationship between axial and orbital
motion during ice ages on the other,well that is an intricate story
that you are not suited to discuss,astronomically,geologically and
bottom line.

I can however leave a hint for those who enjoy the outlines of an
emerging concept.,you otoh can go back to Albert and aether or whatever
you feel inclined to.

The Earth Equatorial bulge is a result of diffential rotation in the
semi-fluid mantle at Equatorial and polar regions,an analogy can be
drawn from similar rotations where something other than a solid crust
is involved,the differential rotation on the Sun's surface for
instance.

http://www.astronomynotes.com/starsun/sun-rotation.gif

Considering that the Equatorial bulge is a terrestial surface feature
included in the planetary umbrella of component tectonic plates,it is
important that a stationary Earth/Convection cells be dropped* as a
concept in order to facilitate the emergence of differential rotation
acting on the component tectonics planets in generating terrestial
surface features,Earthquakes ect.

* http://geology.csupomona.edu/drjessey/class/Gsc101/models.gif


Now Ghost,I have not even mentioned the change in the relationship
between axial and orbital motion during an ice age and the reason why
the Earth's orbit changes shape yet retains Kepler's second law .You
Newtonian freaks have designated the Earth's axial and orbital motions
as a combined sidereal alendrical average and you cannot work with the
indepedent axial and orbital motions as I can.

The change in shape of the Earth's orbit has nothing to do with local
conditions,it is a galactic orbital change in the solar system's
trajectory affecting the Earth's independent heliocentric orbital
trajectory.An analogy is a boat circling a buoy in a lake where there
is no current,its orbit will be circular,a boat circling a buoy with a
variation in current acting on it generates a greater elliptical shape
as the boat (Earth) moves with and against the current (solar system's
orbital trajectory) nothwithstanding that the buoy (Sun) is moving with
the current also.It is not as simple as the analogy but it certainly
ain't Newtonian ballistics applied to planetary motion.It is a way out
to a new type of vision of planetary motion by incorporating a greater
axis,the Milky Way axis rather than going the other way to relativistic
homocentricity which does away with all the cosmological axis.

Carry on in the musty early 20th century atmosphere of Albert and Co,I
am enjoying formulating the conceptual changes arising from independent
planetary motions working off a greater axis and I would'nt waste
another second with the absurd relativistic cartoon nonsense,after
all,it now only serves an isolated cult of individuals.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Gravitational potential - A challenge to Paul Anderson (and to SR)
    ... distinctions his gravitational take on Keplerian motion would look the ... > Minkowski is claiming fortune-telling is possible through mathematics. ... > believe the Earth is the centre of the Universe yet the planets orbit the ... of solar system galactic orbital motion on planetary heliocentric ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Get the geological momentum going
    ... >> crustal tectonic motion explained by another means (convection ... >> cells).It is easy to work with differential rotation on both features ... the 'premise' is that the continents have broken apart. ... BTW - As for orbital motion and 'proof',the Equinox alignment as the ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Dark fantasies?
    ... solution Isaac used to explain planetary motion via the Ra/Dec system. ... months in the direction of galactic orbital motion and 6 months ... the relationship of the orbital motions of the planets to the galactic ... motion in tandem with the visible stars in their motion in one ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Gravitational potential - A challenge to Paul Anderson (and to SR)
    ... >> I don't know what all the fuss is about,Keplerian motion could'nt be ... >> with the planets moving with and against galactic orbital motion while ... >> treating the solar system as an isolated system. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Starmapping software
    ... it is possible _in theory_ to determine the orbital motion from ... observed movement of the planets (and it took the determination and ... The dominant Newtonian mutation to Copernican reasoning has ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)