Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: "Curious" <anthonyroseuk-curious@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 May 2005 14:39:16 -0700
Paul Stowe wrote:
[snip]
> http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html
>
Einstein, 1920: "According to the general theory of relativity space
without ether is unthinkable"
So what powers the drive to oppose it?
Anthony Rose
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- References:
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Curious
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Prev by Date: Re: simple question on twin paradox
- Next by Date: Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Previous by thread: Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Next by thread: Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|