Re: the basic of matter
- From: "La velocidad de la Luz" <neil788@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 May 2005 10:43:47 -0700
>First, you'll have to provide a definition of ``life.''
i dont know
> >why would matter looks and try to understand itself?
> That's harder. You'll need to provide a definition of ``consciousness.''
you are right
a definition to unconsciousness could be good as well
> >are atoms alive?
> Not according to any definition of ``alive'' which would make it useful
>to distinguish between alive and not alive.
what do i know, you ae the smartest guy in the kichen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the basic of matter
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: the basic of matter
- References:
- the basic of matter
- From: Los Coxones
- Re: the basic of matter
- From: Bilge
- the basic of matter
- Prev by Date: Re: the basic of matter
- Next by Date: Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
- Previous by thread: Re: the basic of matter
- Next by thread: Re: the basic of matter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|