Re: How long is a muon when at rest?



Arthur Dent wrote:
> You said muons were point particles. I attribute that to you. That is
> not a mispresentation.
> Infinite density is a conclusion I drew for a point particles having
> mass.

It's an improper conclusion, as I posted elsewhere. Density is a
concept that applies to composite objects only. Bearing mass does not
imply having density and therefore does not imply bearing volume.

PD

> Now you ask me to "stop" misrepresenting what you write.
> What else have I "made up" and attributed to you?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
    ... >Infinite density is a conclusion I drew for a point particles having ... >mass. ... >Now you ask me to "stop" misrepresenting what you write. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
    ... You said muons were point particles. ... not a mispresentation. ... Infinite density is a conclusion I drew for a point particles having ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Our Expanding Universe
    ... >> electron doesn't have infinite density, ... >> such as protons had an effective diameter. ...
    (sci.astro)
Quantcast