Conundrum of Mass and Energy



To All:

Someone proposed this problem in another newsgroup and I thought I'd
relay it here for comment. Here's the problem as given:

============================================================
You have a 1 meter diameter spherical surface of
Unobtanium 597. It has no mass.
This material is 100% reflective in the entire electromagnetic
spectrum, has zero thermal conductivity, infinite strength and
reflects all known particles as well.

Inside this sphere is a 10 kilogram fissionable mass,
triggered to explode in a nuclear fireball at a huge efficiency
*at a random time*.

When it goes off half it's mass will, in the end,
become photons of various sorts and the particles that
remain will all be neutrons (and thus not interact with
the photons). The photons just keep bouncing off
the inside of the sphere ......

How much does the sphere and it's contents mass? When?
============================================================

Now disregarding that a 10k fissionable mass will not convert half it's
mass to photons... still *IF* it did, will the sphere mass the same or
less after the "explosion"?

--
BottleBob
http://home.earthlink.net/~bottlbob
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is light a wave or a particle?
    ... "I have used the word "Virtual" to distinguish invisible particles, ... Depends on if you talk about rest mass or relativistic mass. ... Photons are massless in the sense that they have no *rest* mass. ... >>electromagnetic wave. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is light a wave or a particle?
    ... You wanted to have a word to distinguish a certain type of particles ... >>Depends on if you talk about rest mass or relativistic mass. ... The "energy of motion" factor for photons is p*c. ... > because it is created from a moving light wave and a virtual particle. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: SR theory is simplistic
    ... shift in velocity and frequency of the emitted photons. ... a rate that WOULD push particles faster than c IF they could go faster. ... The choice was between violating conservation laws regarding mass and violating conservation laws regarding charge. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: particles without mass!
    ... > stastical mechanics I encuntered some special particles: ... > HAVE NO MASS!!! ... I hope you realise that when you say photons have no mass, ... > from special relativity that mass is only a particular type of energy ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The measurement problem.
    ... The universe is wall-to-wall particles. ... What are the characteristics of these lattice particles (e.g., mass, ... They are photons, i.e., they have no charge and no mass. ...
    (sci.physics)