Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 22:00:04 GMT
In sci.physics.relativity, Dirk Van de moortel
<dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sun, 29 May 2005 18:14:30 GMT
<aEnme.104626$Rp6.6179850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:up0pm2-5av.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> In sci.physics.relativity, macromitch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <macromitch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote
>> on 29 May 2005 00:31:14 -0700
>> <1117351874.533560.76910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > SR says that at high speeds space-time is
>> > contracted. Bow do you get to these high speeds?
>> > So acceleration through space is the cause.
>> > Period.
>> >
>>
>> An interesting if curious point. SR can't address this
>> (mostly because SR doesn't do acceleration) and GR only
>> deals with the acceleration -- once the body stops
>> accelerating, it is still moving (SR) but no longer has
>> effects because of the acceleration (GR).
>
> http://hermes.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~dkoks/Faq/Relativity/SR/acceleration.html
> http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?&threadm=bi75vd$qbm$1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.geocities.com/slithytove5/AccelClocks.htm
> http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Acceleration.html
>
> Dirk Vdm
>
Oops. Well, now at least I can see your name to spell it correctly. :-)
I'll admit I've no idea where the OP is going (accelerating?) with this
statement of his.
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
- References:
- SR on accelerating frame of reference
- From: Curious
- Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
- From: macromitch
- Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
- From: macromitch
- Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- SR on accelerating frame of reference
- Prev by Date: Re: How long is a muon when at rest?
- Next by Date: Re: What is BaT, exactly?
- Previous by thread: Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
- Next by thread: Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|