sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: kk
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: GOD=G_uv: HAMMOND YAWNS AT HECKLERS
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Gyroverse book
  • From: jimk
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• johnreed take 16
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• 100 years today!
  • From: ttdaomd
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Neutrino's Energy Has Gravity
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Neutrino's Energy Has Gravity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: John Park
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: pi and numbers 2
  • From: am
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein & relativity
  • From: kk
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Coriolis effect question (fwd from sci.astro.amateur)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: GOD=G_uv: HAMMOND YAWNS AT HECKLERS
  • From: TMG
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein & relativity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: GOD=G_uv: HAMMOND YAWNS AT HECKLERS
  • From: TMG
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: pi and numbers 2
  • From: am
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Hammond Still Unable: Eickmeier Anti-SPOG Re-post
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: 3 time dimensions?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Hammond Still Unable: Eickmeier Anti-SPOG Re-post
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: relativity question
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Proof that HUP is wrong
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Einstein & relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• The existence of physics ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Einstein & relativity
  • From: mtm
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: sue jahn
• Hammond Still Unable: Eickmeier Anti-SPOG Re-post
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Einstein & relativity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: David Evens
• Re: time dilation and doppler
  • From: xxein
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: Holden
• time dilation and doppler
  • From: wespe
• Re: GOD=G_uv: HAMMOND YAWNS AT HECKLERS
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: GOD=G_uv: HAMMOND YAWNS AT HECKLERS
  • From: am
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: John Park
• Re: Time - subtle thief of youth, or just plain silly?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: the Ultimate Frame of Reference
  • From: dwhig265
• Looking for TEXT on Gravitational waves
  • From: MosS
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: russell
• Re: the Ultimate Frame of Reference
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: GR question
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Time - subtle thief of youth, or just plain silly?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time - subtle thief of youth, or just plain silly?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Time - subtle thief of youth, or just plain silly?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time - subtle thief of youth, or just plain silly?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Einstein & relativity
  • From: Gerhard@AMSwb
• Re: Time - subtle thief of youth, or just plain silly?
  • From: Adie
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time - subtle thief of youth, or just plain silly?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Time - subtle thief of youth, or just plain silly?
  • From: Adie
• Re: the Ultimate Frame of Reference
  • From: Harry
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: An ether theory for the standard model
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Singularity-Free Collapse through Local Inflation
  • From: Hunter
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Blitz_Commander
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the Ultimate Frame of Reference
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: the Ultimate Frame of Reference
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: the Ultimate Frame of Reference
  • From: Steven
• Re: pi and numbers 2
  • From: Perspicacious
• pi and numbers 2
  • From: am
• Re: the Ultimate Frame of Reference
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Photons and reference
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• the Ultimate Frame of Reference
  • From: Steven
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Hammond Unable to Answer Eickmeier Anti-SPOG
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Photons and reference
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Photons and reference
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hammond Unable to Answer Eickmeier Anti-SPOG
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Hammond Unable to Answer Eickmeier Anti-SPOG
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Photons and reference
  • From: Bruno
• Re: Who said this and when ?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: David Evens
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Marv Raybin
• Re: Coriolis effect: Veer to the left, or veer to the right?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: One Fast Meteor
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: NOMINATION: Bill Hobba for the Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Coriolis effect: Veer to the left, or veer to the right?
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
  • From: tontoko
• Re: Who said this and when ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
  • From: tontoko
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Who said this and when ?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: Sue...
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Relativistic Complex Analysis
  • From: tontoko
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: xxein
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Bill Rowe
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: One Fast Meteor
  • From: russell
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: russell
• Re: One Fast Meteor
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: One Fast Meteor
  • From: Steven
• Re: One Fast Meteor
  • From: russell
• Re: what was before galaxies?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: One Fast Meteor
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: One Fast Meteor
  • From: russell
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Sue...
• One Fast Meteor
  • From: Steven
• Re: Coriolis effect question (fwd from sci.astro.amateur)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Seeking Relativity Experts for Doc Film
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: An ether theory for the standard model
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Who said this and when ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Richard Saam
• Who said this and when ?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Wesley Henwood
• Re: what was before galaxies?
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: what was before galaxies?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: expanding universe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: what was before galaxies?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: negative curvature
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: what was before galaxies?
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: expanding universe
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Harry
• Re: NOMINATION: Bill Hobba for the Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Filmmakers rather than physicists
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: wespe
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: dark energy
  • From: TomGee
• Re: dark energy
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Blitz_Commander
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: David Evens
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Blitz_Commander
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: expanding universe
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: what was before galaxies?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The set of all possible frames
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: negative curvature
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: are curvatures flat?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dark energy
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: are curvatures flat?
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: EL
• angels and devils theory
  • From: Big Crunch
• what was before galaxies?
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: are curvatures flat?
  • From: herlao
• Re: The set of all possible frames
  • From: Steven
• expanding universe
  • From: LSB
• dark energy
  • From: Big Crunch
• are curvatures flat?
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• negative curvature
  • From: LSB
• Re: tidal forces are particles?
  • From: LSB
• Re: The set of all possible frames
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• expanding universe
  • From: LSB
• The set of all possible frames
  • From: Steven
• The set of all possible frames
  • From: Steven
• Hammond Blocks Hecklers
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: guskz
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: Coriolis effect question (fwd from sci.astro.amateur)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: Harry
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: Harry
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: EL
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• An ether theory for the standard model
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Coriolis effect question (fwd from sci.astro.amateur)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: EL
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Coriolis effect question (fwd from sci.astro.amateur)
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: herlao
• Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: EL
• Re: numbers like pi and stuff
  • From: am
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Richard Hachel
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Not Martin Stone
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: James Baugh
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• BB
  • From: M D Meenken
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: Not of Interest? But how?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Setting the bar...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: David Evens
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: David Evens
• Re: Setting the bar...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Not of Interest? But how?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: shuba
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Steven
• Re: numbers like pi and stuff
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: breaking the light barrier
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: cgs vs mks; was h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: GarryDenke
• breaking the light barrier
  • From: Steven
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: numbers like pi and stuff
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: hbar=e^2u0c ; hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: GarryDenke
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: Tom Roberts
• numbers like pi and stuff
  • From: am
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: wespe
• Re: time
  • From: am
• alpha * omega / c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: time
  • From: am
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Speed of light in medium constant?
  • From: wespe
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Setting the bar...
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Sometimes It's Better Just to Do Less Harm
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: PD
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Setting the bar...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: 3 time dimensions?
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: TomGee
• New Physics Theory
  • From: Don
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: Sometimes It's Better Just to Do Less Harm
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Setting the bar...
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Sometimes It's Better Just to Do Less Harm
  • From: U . K .
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Bilge
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Setting the bar...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Science and dishonesty
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Not of Interest? But how?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Setting the bar...
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Setting the bar...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: light is transparent
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: Seeking Relativity Experts for Doc Film
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: tidal forces are particles?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR question
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: russell
• Re: GR question
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: russell
• Re: GR question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR question
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: tidal forces are particles?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: Bilge
• Re: light is transparent
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR question
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Not of Interest? But how?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: GR question
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: Sue...
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Seeking Relativity Experts for Doc Film
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: tidal forces are particles?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Seeking Relativity Experts for Doc Film
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: tidal forces are particles?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GR question
  • From: PD
• Re: Seeking Relativity Experts for Doc Film
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: member
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Seeking Relativity Experts for Doc Film
  • From: member
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: PD
• Re: Seeking Relativity Experts for Doc Film
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 2D
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Seeking Relativity Experts for Doc Film
  • From: Perspective
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: am
• Re: Seeking Relativity Experts for Doc Film
  • From: member
• Re: light is transparent
  • From: member
• Re: light is transparent
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: e=sqrt(hbar/z0) ; e=sqrt(hbare0c) ; e=sqrt(hbar/u0c)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: EL
• Re: tidal forces are particles?
  • From: Plate Tectonics
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: Sue...
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: member
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: EL
• Re: speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: sue jahn
• tidal forces are particles?
  • From: member
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: member
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: am
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: Dr . Who ?
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: EL
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: John Kennaugh
• speed of light hitting a mirror
  • From: member
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: am
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: Sue...
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: am
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: member
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: member
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: Mad Cow
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: EL
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: member
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: am
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: Tour Guide
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Traveler
• relativity falsified by wormholes and time travels
  • From: member
• Re: einstein tensor, moment of rotation and metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: light is transparent
  • From: member
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: member
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: light is transparent
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Look on the bright side
  • From: Kool Aid
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Look on the bright side
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: light is transparent
  • From: Kha
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Non constant speed of light (second postulate)
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Non constant speed of light (second postulate)
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: harry
• Re: Space and time
  • From: harry
• Re: 3 time dimensions?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: Bilge
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Non Ame
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Not of Interest? But how?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• light is transparent
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: EL
• Re: 3 time dimensions?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: xxein
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: Sue...
• Muon Decay Parameters
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Not of Interest? But how?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Cosmology: how does density change with time?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR question
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR question
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR question
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Non constant speed of light (second postulate)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: EL
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: TomGee
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Non constant speed of light (second postulate)
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: EL
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: 3 time dimensions?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Non constant speed of light (second postulate)
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Cosmology: how does density change with time?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Tom Roberts
• GR question
  • From: ajiko
• Re: 3 time dimensions?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Obtuse
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Non constant speed of light (second postulate)
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Tired of being constant harassed with SPOG -- relax and enjoy Anti-SPOG
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Obtuse
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Non constant speed of light (second postulate)
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Obtuse
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Non constant speed of light (second postulate)
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Bilge
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: jem
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Who invented the four-vector formulation?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Not of Interest? But how?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: rate of time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Bilge
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: EL
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Nick
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Nick
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Nick
• Re: rate of time
  • From: Nick
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Not of Interest? But how?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: rate of time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: rate of time
  • From: kenseto
• Re: the basis of relativityQ
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Not of Interest? But how?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: johnreed take15
  • From: randamajor
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: rate of time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Obtuse
• Re: time
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Who invented the four-vector formulation?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Obtuse
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Obtuse
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Who invented the four-vector formulation?
  • From: Sunny Suen
• Re: Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: Enrie
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Bryan Shelton
• Who invented the four-vector formulation?
  • From: Sunny Suen
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: rate of time
  • From: kenseto
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: jem
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: Non constant speed of light (second postulate)
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: *** rD
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: Bryan Shelton
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: Non constant speed of light (second postulate)
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Stephan Schiffels
• Re: Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: sue jahn
• Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: TomGee
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Barry
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: time
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: rate of time
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: rate of time
  • From: xxein
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: rate of time
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: shuba
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time dilation and curved space: a question
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: *** rD
• Re: rate of time
  • From: am
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• time
  • From: am
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity
  • From: alpha_geek
• johnreed take15
  • From: randamajor
• johnreed take 15
  • From: randamajor
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• rate of time
  • From: padremo
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 3 time dimensions?
  • From: nano
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• matter - light relation
  • From: nano
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: alanmc95210
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Re: Time dilation and curved space: a question
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: kk
• Re: Time dilation and curved space: a question
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: jem
• Re: 3 time dimensions?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time dilation and curved space: a question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time dilation and curved space: a question
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 3 time dimensions?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Don Giovanni
• if c is constant why redshifts?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: 3 time dimensions?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Harry
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Harry
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Nick
• Re: 3 time dimensions?
  • From: Nick
• Time dilation and curved space: a question
  • From: Enkidu Jones
• 3 time dimensions?
  • From: wespe
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Bryan Shelton
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Nick
• Re: Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: alanmc95210
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Bryan Shelton
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "She certainly seems to respond to visual stimuli."
  • From: xxein
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Rudiment of Effectuationist GUT
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl
  • From: member
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: member
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: member
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: member
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: member
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: member
• Re: 2D
  • From: Hylander
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: member
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: member
• Re: GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: member
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: member
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: member
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: member
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• GR for Roberts, Carlip, Daryl, Bilge/ Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: 2D
  • From: PD
• Re: Space and time
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Space and time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: Skipper
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Harry
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: 2D
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "She certainly seems to respond to visual stimuli."
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Space and time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Space and time
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: jem
• Re: "She certainly seems to respond to visual stimuli."
  • From: Curious
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: jem
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: forehead
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: jem
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr (globarr) Book of Knowledge!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: David Evens
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Harry
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "She certainly seems to respond to visual stimuli."
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: science_illiterate
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Nick
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: shuba
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: DJINGATTILA
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: David Evens
• Re: 2D
  • From: xxein
• Re: 2D
  • From: Traveler
• Re: 2D
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: shuba
• Re: SpaceTime 4D is Time 1D & Space 3D, What about 2D?
  • From: shuba
• Re: 2D
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: 2D
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Nick
• Re: 2D
  • From: Hylander
• Re: SpaceTime 4D is Time 1D & Space 3D, What about 2D?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: xxein
• Re: "She certainly seems to respond to visual stimuli."
  • From: xxein
• Re: SpaceTime 4D is Time 1D & Space 3D, What about 2D?
  • From: Hylander
• Re: 2D
  • From: bz
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re : Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SpaceTime 4D is Time 1D & Space 3D, What about 2D?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: 2D
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: America is going to destroy comets
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: 2D
  • From: Hylander
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: member
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: bad shoes
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: 2D
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: America is going to destroy comets
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: 2D
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: bad shoes
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 2D
  • From: Hylander
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: bad shoes
• Re: 2D
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 2D
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: bad shoes
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: bad shoes
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 2D
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: bad shoes
• Re: 2D
  • From: Hylander
• Re: Some Beginner SR Questions
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dean Elliot
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: bad shoes
• Re: 2D
  • From: bz
• Re: 2D
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: 2D
  • From: Hylander
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: 2D
  • From: Hylander
• Re: 2D
  • From: xoomflex
• "She certainly seems to respond to visual stimuli."
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: 2D
  • From: Hylander
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: uucp
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: uucp
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: uucp
• Re: 2D
  • From: Hylander
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: uucp
• Re: 2D
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 2D
  • From: Hylander
• Re: 2D
  • From: Gone Fishing
• Re: 2D
  • From: Harry
• Re: 2D
  • From: Traveler
• Re: 2D
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Paper Scissors Rock
• Re: 2D
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Curious
• 2D
  • From: Hylander
• Re: SpaceTime 4D is Time 1D & Space 3D, What about 2D?
  • From: Hylander
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• Re: Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: russell
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: jem
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: jem
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: jem
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Harry
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: David Evens
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: science_illiterate
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: jem
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Is Louis Savain the next Einstein??
  • From: David Evens
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Curious
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: science_illiterate
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: America is going to destroy comets
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SpaceTime 4D is Time 1D & Space 3D, What about 2D?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: O'Barr: Patents and copyrights.
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: *** rD
• Re: SpaceTime 4D is Time 1D & Space 3D, What about 2D?
  • From: Hylander
• Re: Gravity experiment
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Farticals
  • From: *** rD
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: science_illiterate
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: science_illiterate
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Hylander
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: David Evens
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• To Don Giovanni; was Re: complex numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Farticals
  • From: Aristotle
• Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
  • From: Curious
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is Louis Savain the next Einstein??
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: EL
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Robert Kolker
• SpaceTime 4D is Time 1D & Space 3D, What about 2D?
  • From: Hylander
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Hylander
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: xxein
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified?
  • From: xxein
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: xxein
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: America is going to destroy comets
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Bryan Shelton
• Re: hbar=e^2u0c ; hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: randamajor
• Re: man made black hole
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Don Giovanni
• man made black hole
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: One approach for SR.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Don Giovanni
• One approach for SR.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gravity experiment
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Gravity experiment
  • From: *** rD
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Gravity experiment
  • From: *** rD
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: *** rD
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Traveler
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: russell
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Sue...
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr (globarr) Book of Knowledge!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Is Louis Savain the next Einstein??
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The fabric of space
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Erik TL
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: russell
• The fabric of space
  • From: Deon Joubert
• Re: Is Louis Savain the next Einstein??
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: science_illiterate
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: science_illiterate
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr (globarr) Book of Knowledge!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: science_illiterate
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: jem
• Re: "AllYou!" <idaman @ conversent.net>
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: jem
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: jem
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: jem
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Is Louis Savain the next Einstein??
  • From: Traveler
• From: "AllYou!" <idaman @ conversent.net>
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: From first principles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: science_illiterate
• Re: Farticals
  • From: St.M
• Re: Farticals
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Farticals
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: From first principles
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Farticals
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Is Louis Savain the next Einstein??
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Philosophy of postscientism
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What happened to this NG?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• What happened to this NG?
  • From: science_illiterate
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Farticals
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Farticals
  • From: *** rD
• Re: From first principles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: Harry
• Re: From first principles
  • From: *** rD
• Re: The beginning of the end of postscientism
  • From: Harry
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Nick
• Is this cosmological density correct?
  • From: jana_milova
• Philosophy of postscientism
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• O'Barr: Patents and copyrights.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity FlashLight Effect
  • From: xxein
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: russell
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: EL
• Re: Is Louis Savain the next Einstein??
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: xxein
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: O'Barr: The 'visible' ether!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: alanmc95210
• Re: From first principles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: jimk
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: uucp
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: uucp
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: From first principles
  • From: *** rD
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: uucp
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: russell
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: Rozmonth
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: From first principles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: From first principles
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: EL
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: EL
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: *** rD
• America is going to destroy comets
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: From first principles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: *** rD
• The beginning of the end of postscientism
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: From first principles
  • From: *** rD
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: uucp
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: uucp
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: uucp
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: uucp
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: uucp
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: uucp
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: uucp
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: PD
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: uucp
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: uucp
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: uucp
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: uucp
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: uucp
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: GLHTT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Non Ame
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Non Ame
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: Starx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Non Ame
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• GLHTT
  • From: EL
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: From first principles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: From first principles
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: PD
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: PD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: jem
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: From first principles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Chickens Eggs and BB theories
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Chickens Eggs and BB theories
  • From: EL
• Re: Chickens Eggs and BB theories
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Chickens Eggs and BB theories
  • From: EL
• Re: will you trust a relativist unable to play chess?
  • From: EL
• Re: will you trust a relativist unable to play chess?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Chickens Eggs and BB theories
  • From: sue jahn
• Uncertainty and Continuity?
  • From: Russell E. Rierson
• Re: From first principles
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Bernardz
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: einstein tensor, moment of rotation and metric
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: alanmc95210
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• einstein tensor, moment of rotation and metric
  • From: disposablemailaccountfornews
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: cgs vs mks; was h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: cgs vs mks; was h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Relativity of Rigidity...
  • From: Starx
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• cgs vs mks; was h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: From first principles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: hbar=e^2u0c
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: From first principles
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: From first principles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Stochastic mechanics articles requested.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Stochastic mechanics articles requested.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Stochastic mechanics articles requested.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Stochastic mechanics articles requested.
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: O'Barr: The 'visible' ether!
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: From first principles
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: complex numbers
  • From: Aage Andersen
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• complex numbers
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: From first principles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: From first principles
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time Relatively Confused
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: O'Barr (globarr) Book of Knowledge!
  • From: Curious
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time Relatively Confused
  • From: EL
• hbar=e^2u0c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: David Evens
• From first principles
  • From: *** rD
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Nick
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: PD
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Nick
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Nick
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: PD
• Re: O'Barr (globarr) Book of Knowledge!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Nick
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: PD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Photon Energy/Gravitational Field
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Cosmology: how does density change with time?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: PD
• Re: Examining Mathematical Approaches
  • From: alanmc95210
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Learned Opinions Solicited...Any connection between Xmas Quake 2004 and the Gamma ray burst seen 1 day later?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Photon Energy/Gravitational Field
  • From: Old Man
• Hands as handles for "slow transport"
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: O'Barr (globarr) Book of Knowledge!
  • From: Curious
• aether/absolute space myth
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Learned Opinions Solicited...Any connection between Xmas Quake 2004 and the Gamma ray burst seen 1 day later?
  • From: R. M.
• Re: Cosmology: how does density change with time?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Photon Energy/Gravitational Field
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: O'Barr (globarr) Book of Knowledge!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Cosmology: how does density change with time?
  • From: jana_milova
• Re: Learned Opinions Solicited...Any connection between Xmas Quake 2004 and the Gamma ray burst seen 1 day later?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: kenseto
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: kenseto
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Time Relatively Confused
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: kenseto
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: russell
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Learned Opinions Solicited...Any connection between Xmas Quake 2004 and the Gamma ray burst seen 1 day later?
  • From: R. M.
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: jem
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Sue...
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: O'Barr (globarr) Book of Knowledge!
  • From: Curious
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Nick
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: russell
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Curious
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: russell
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Curious
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Nick
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: shuba
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Tom Roberts
• O'Barr (globarr) Book of Knowledge!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: PD
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: LIGO or Gravity Probe B
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: LIGO or Gravity Probe B
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: PD
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: PD
• Re: Imagine
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: LIGO or Gravity Probe B
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: uucp
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: LIGO or Gravity Probe B
  • From: uucp
• Re: LIGO or Gravity Probe B
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: uucp
• LIGO or Gravity Probe B
  • From: uucp
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: uucp
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: PD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Harry
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: frog
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: frog
• Re: Is Gravity a Supercomputer?
  • From: frog
• Re: Is Gravity a Supercomputer?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators
  • From: frog
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: frog
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: frog
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: frog
• Re: Einstein on ether
  • From: frog
• Re: gyroscope levitation
  • From: frog
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: gyroscope levitation
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein on ether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bilge
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: bernardz
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Sue...
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Paul Sholtz
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Imagine
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Is Gravity a Supercomputer?
  • From: DT
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: uucp
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: gyroscope levitation
  • From: uucp
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: gyroscope levitation
  • From: russell
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• Re: gyroscope levitation
  • From: uucp
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sal
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Traveler
• Re: gyroscope levitation
  • From: russell
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• gyroscope levitation
  • From: uucp
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: The 'visible' ether!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: PD
• Re: hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: massless
• Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: praticel and waevs
  • From: massless
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: jem
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: will you trust a relativist unable to play chess?
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Harry
• Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: O'Barr: The 'visible' ether!
  • From: ajiko
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox
  • From: xxein
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: praticel and waevs
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: will you trust a relativist unable to play chess?
  • From: xxein
• Re: will you trust a relativist unable to play chess?
  • From: PD
• Re: Dark matter energy & CMBR connection
  • From: massless
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: massless
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Pmb
• Re: will you trust a relativist unable to play chess?
  • From: massless
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: will you trust a relativist unable to play chess?
  • From: PD
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• will you trust a relativist unable to play chess?
  • From: uucp
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Curious
• Re: johnreed take 14 - 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: uucp
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: uucp
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Curious
• Re: Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Harry
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Best setup
  • From: Harry
• Re: Best setup
  • From: Harry
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Best setup
  • From: Bruno Campanini
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Curious
• Re: Best setup
  • From: Bruno Campanini
• Re: Best setup
  • From: Harry
• Re: Best setup
  • From: uucp
• Breathtaking development of the theory of relativity
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Best setup
  • From: PD
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: perpetual
• Re: Best setup
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Best setup
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Best setup
  • From: Bruno Campanini
• Re: Best setup
  • From: perpetual
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Bernardz
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: perpetual
• Re: Best setup
  • From: Harry
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Brad W
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Harry
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Best setup
  • From: Bruno Campanini
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Curious
• Re: LET
  • From: Harry
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Harry
• Re: O'Barr: The 'visible' ether!
  • From: Harry
• Re: LET
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: LET
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Traveler
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: LET (was: Re: Einstein on ether)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: massless
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: massless
• Re: This about Newton's First Law
  • From: massless
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: massless
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: PD
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Why the Aether is Substantial
  • From: Ivan V. Krasnyj
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Brad W
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Brad W
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Brad W
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Traveler
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Brad W
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Brad W
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Brad W
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Brad W
• Re: superluminal velocities
  • From: Brad W
• superluminal velocities
  • From: jimk
• Re: moron bilge sends your posts to his groups alt.moron and alt.troll
  • From: Brad W
• Re: moron bilge is the same as "T Wake" sending your posts to his groups alt.moron and alt.troll
  • From: Brad W
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• O'Barr: The 'visible' ether!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: moron bilge sends your posts to his groups alt.moron and alt.troll
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: moron bilge sends your posts to his groups alt.moron and alt.troll
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: moron bilge sends your posts to his groups alt.moron and alt.troll
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Harry
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: russell
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: PD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Brad W
• Re: what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• what is more dificult, relativity or ether?
  • From: Brad W
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Brad W
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Michelson - Morley experiment
  • From: Harry
• Re: Michelson - Morley experiment
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: dralexgreen
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Wugi
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: praticel and waevs
  • From: *** rD
• Re: no UFO proves relativity wrong
  • From: massless
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: no UFO proves relativity wrong
  • From: massless
• Re: praticel and waevs
  • From: *** rD
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: massless
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: massless
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: massless
• Re: no UFO proves relativity wrong
  • From: massless
• Re: no UFO proves relativity wrong
  • From: massless
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: no UFO proves relativity wrong
  • From: Bilge
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel? (SPAM)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Relativity religion or science? Harry Jerry
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Relativity religion or science? Bob
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: LET (was: Re: Einstein on ether)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Relativity religion or science?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: All Ye thousands, tell George Hammond SPOG or SPOD
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Einstein on ether
  • From: xxein
• Re: All Ye thousands, tell George Hammond SPOG or SPOD
  • From: shuba
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: shuba
• LET (was: Re: Einstein on ether)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein on ether
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Einstein on ether
  • From: ajiko
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Bryan Shelton
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Bryan Shelton
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: no UFO proves relativity wrong
  • From: PD
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: EL
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: praticel and waevs
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Imagine
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Einstein on ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein on ether
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: no UFO proves relativity wrong
  • From: PD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• ether might be god
  • From: chronos
• Re: Relativity religion or science? Bob
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Wugi
• Re: Imagine
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno
  • From: markwh04
• Re: no UFO proves relativity wrong
  • From: chronos
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: markwh04
• Re: no UFO proves relativity wrong
  • From: YBM
• Re: Imagine
  • From: Sue...
• Re: praticel and waevs
  • From: Sue...
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Michelson - Morley experiment
  • From: *** rD
• Re: praticel and waevs
  • From: Sue...
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: no UFO proves relativity wrong
  • From: Sue...
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• no UFO proves relativity wrong
  • From: chronos
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: chronos
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Einstein on ether
  • From: chronos
• Re: Einstein on ether
  • From: ajiko
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: chronos
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: chronos
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: chronos
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: *** rD
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Relativity religion or science?
  • From: Robert Kolker
• praticel and waevs
  • From: chronos
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Relativity religion or science? Harry Jerry
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Michelson - Morley experiment
  • From: Jan Frejlak
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: EL
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Relativity religion or science?
  • From: Leonard Abbott
• Re: The Paradox of Zeno
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: sal
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: LET question.
  • From: ajiko
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: Harry
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Relativity religion or science?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Einstein on ether
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: PD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Bryan Shelton
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Bryan Shelton
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: bz
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Bryan Shelton
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Relativity religion or science?
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Bryan Shelton
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: LET question.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: EL
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: harry
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: harry
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: LET question.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: systems perturbated by observation
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Einstein on ether
  • From: ajiko
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Physics in Greenwich Village NYC
  • From: xxein
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• LET question.
  • From: ajiko
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Curious
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• free- A Hot Mystery Not History
  • From: relativitybeyondeinstein
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Imagine
  • From: pretender
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: PD
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: pretender
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: EL
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: pretender
• Re: Imagine
  • From: pretender
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: destiny
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: shuba
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: destiny
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bilge
• the ether paradocs
  • From: destiny
• Re: is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: Traveler
• is my destiny already picture in space-time diagram?
  • From: destiny
• Re: kerr geometry
  • From: markwh04
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: destiny
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: destiny
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: cvandertogt
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: sal
• Re: systems perturbated by observation
  • From: destiny
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: EL
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: systems perturbated by observation
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: systems perturbated by observation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: slowing down the speed of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Curious
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Max Dowdt
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Wayne Faber
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Traveler
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: EL
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: EL
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Curious
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: EL
• Re: O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Curious
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• O'Barr: The end of SR!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: destiny
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: Calculating v[t], x[t], and t'[t] for an constant accelerated object.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Imagine
  • From: destiny
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: bz
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Imagine
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure.
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: PD
• Re: Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Imagine
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure.
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Imagine
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure.
• Re: My Dinner With André, the Lapdog Physicist (Humor)
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure.
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure.
• Time is the paper on which the pen of the aether writes.
  • From: Curious
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Wayne Faber
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Tau of SR
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Baugh
• Re: slowing down the speed of light
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure.
• Re: systems perturbated by observation
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure.
• Re: systems perturbated by observation
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure.
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: FTL Communication ?
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: russell
• Re: systems perturbated by observation
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: cvandertogt
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Curious
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Curious
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Curious
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: berthold-mueller
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Curious
• Re: slowing down the speed of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Tau of SR
  • From: ajiko
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Science and prostitution
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Two astronauts in 2 frames...
  • From: Curious
• relativity goes bananas as Unified Physics
  • From: relativitybeyondeinstein
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: russell
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: sal
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 14 - 2005
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: *** rD
• Re: johnreed take 14 - 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: SR Postulate on Speed of Light
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: which is better for realtivity
  • From: sal
• Re: slowing down the speed of light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Tau of SR
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: Bilge
• Re: ideal light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: PD
• Re: Imagine
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Curious
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: chronos
• Re: Imagine
  • From: chronos
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: PD
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: chronos
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: PD
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: chronos
• Re: Imagine
  • From: chronos
• Re: how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: shevek
• Re: Imagine
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Imagine
  • From: chronos
• Re: Imagine
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Imagine
  • From: chronos
• how fast could a single photon fly
  • From: chronos
• Re: slowing down the speed of light
  • From: chronos
• Re: ideal light
  • From: chronos
• Re: ideal light
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Imagine
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Time difference
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question PD or anybody
  • From: sal
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Harry
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: ideal light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: *** rD
• Cell-structured physical space
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: slowing down the speed of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: The speed of light.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: systems perturbated by observation
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Imagine
  • From: M D Meenken
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: cvandertogt
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Light Toys
  • From: EL
• Re: Light Toys
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure.
• Re: Light Toys
  • From: EL
• Re: Retic Postings and SPAM
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Light Toys
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure.
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure.
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Harry
• Imagine
  • From: *** rD
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Light Toys
  • From: EL
• Re: slowing down the speed of light
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure
• Re: slowing down the speed of light
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: I think a bit more and say he has a point. But with regard to the above even after thinking about it a bit I am not so sure
• Re: Light Toys
  • From: abrasive
• Re: Light Toys
  • From: abrasive
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: abrasive
• Re: ideal light
  • From: abrasive
• Re: ideal light
  • From: abrasive
• Re: Tau of SR
  • From: Benno Muilwyk
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: cvandertogt
• Question PD or anybody
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Bilge
• Re: ideal light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: cvandertogt
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Tau of SR
  • From: ajiko
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Light Toys
  • From: EL
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Jack
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Non Ame
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: shuba
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Light Toys
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: slowing down the speed of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Aether and Relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Aether and Relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: ideal light
  • From: PD
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Non Ame
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: PD
• Re: Light Toys
  • From: EL
• Re: can relativity be ported?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Aether and Relativity
  • From: Laurent
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: systems perturbated by observation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: sal
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: vergon_enterprises
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Neil G
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Time dilation
  • From: vergon_enterprises
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Neil G
• ideal light
  • From: Neil G
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: Neil G
• systems perturbated by observation
  • From: Neil G
• Is Fitzgerald contraction real?
  • From: sal
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Collection of Ideas by blochee
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Neil G
• Re: can relativity be ported?
  • From: Neil G
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Sue...
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: sal
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Neil G
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: can relativity be ported?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Neil G
• Re: Light Toys
  • From: Neil G
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Sue...
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Neil G
• Light Toys
  • From: EL
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Incompetent Science
  • From: Neil G
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Neil G
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: photon collisions
  • From: Sue...
• Incompetent Science
  • From: cvandertogt
• can relativity be ported?
  • From: Neil G
• photon collisions
  • From: Neil G
• slowing down the speed of light
  • From: isosce
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: what is stronger
  • From: velour
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: macarena womenrights
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Harry
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Max Dowdt
• Retic Postings and SPAM
  • From: Hcraes
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: vern
• Re: FTL Communication ?
  • From: Spud
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Astroguru
• Re: The Aether and Relativity
  • From: Laurent
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• A song about Science
  • From: erik schaepers
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: *** rD
• Re: If
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Oliver Brausch
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: If
  • From: *** rD
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: jcgonsowski
• Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: *** rD
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativistic rotational kinetic energy
  • From: mikecoon
• Re: The Aether and Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• O'Barr: The purpose of science.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Curious
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Curious
• Re: The Aether and Relativity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: A Collection of Ideas by blochee
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• A Collection of Ideas by blochee
  • From: blochee
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: tensorial product
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Aether and Relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: jcgonsowski
• The Aether and Relativity
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: FTL Communication ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: macarena womenrights
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: johnreed take 13 - 2005 first draft
  • From: randamajor
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: macarena womenrights
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: kenseto
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: kenseto
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: *** rD
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Astroguru
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: macarena
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: *** rD
• Re: time waves
  • From: *** rD
• Re: If
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: PD
• Re: If
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: macarena
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: PD
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: macarena
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: macarena
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: PD
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: digest
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: digest
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: digest
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: PD
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: digest
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: congruente
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: PD
• Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: time waves
  • From: *** rD
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The velocity of light.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
  • From: newsrudy
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: berthold-mueller
• Re: time waves
  • From: *** rD
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: abrasive
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: abrasive
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: abrasive
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: abrasive
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Astroguru
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: PD
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: cadwgan_gedrych
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: kenseto
• Re: FTL Communication ?
  • From: David McAnally
• Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Astroguru
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: FTL Communication ?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Harry
• Re: FTL Communication ?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: A local-ether model of propagation of electromagnetic wave
  • From: Pekka Virtanen
• Re: Polarized light.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: *** rD
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: time waves
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: shuba
• Re: time flows backwards
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: time waves
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• time flows backwards
  • From: abrasive
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Harry
• Re: If speed was relative
  • From: abrasive
• If speed was relative
  • From: *** rD
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: *** rD
• Re: If
  • From: *** rD
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: If
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Harry
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Relativity and Clocks
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Question About Length Contraction
  • From: Harry
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bending of light not well authenticated
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The velocity of light.
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: If
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Welcome to sci.physics.relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Max Dowdt
• Re: mass to energy conversion only a postulate
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR on accelerating frame of reference
  • From: Pmb
• Re: relativistic rotational kinetic energy
  • From: Pmb
• Re: relativistic rotational kinetic energy
  • From: Pmb
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The velocity of light.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: FTL Communication ?
  • From: Spud
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Question About Length Contraction
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: The velocity of light.
  • From: n
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: David McAnally
• Re: the basis of relativity
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: kerr geometry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: gravity is fake
  • From: PD
• Re: kerr geometry
  • From: abrasive
• Re: kerr geometry
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: kerr geometry
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: FTL Communication ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: another mistake in physics
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: abrasive
• Re: The velocity of light.
  • From: abrasive
• Re: O'Barr: The illogic of SR experts!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: kerr geometry
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: The velocity of light.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: abrasive
• Re: time waves
  • From: abrasive
• Re: FTL Communication ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Curious
• Re: CMBR- A More Explicit Answer
  • From: Bill Hobba