Re: If speed was relative
- From: "*** rD" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:31:57 +0100
"macarena womenrights" <petrol@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1117662922.150636.282610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > I think you mean stretching ? as opposed to contracting.
|
| oh yes, i ment stratching, io no hablas inglesia, sorry
|
|
| i cant understand the rest
|
I'll plug my Spanish? module in and translate. Might take a day or so,
confirm Spanish ?
--
rD *** E-field = Electric field, M-field =Magnetic field, two unbound
field effects
http://home.freeuk.com/paulps/
Maybe updates. The spuds, beans and onions are coming up nicely. Ooh
ah.{:-)
.
- References:
- If speed was relative
- From: *** rD
- Re: If speed was relative
- From: abrasive
- Re: If speed was relative
- From: *** rD
- Re: If speed was relative
- From: congruente
- Re: If speed was relative
- From: *** rD
- Re: If speed was relative
- From: macarena womenrights
- If speed was relative
- Prev by Date: Re: the basis of relativity
- Next by Date: Re: O'Barr: The purpose of science.
- Previous by thread: Re: If speed was relative
- Next by thread: Re: If speed was relative
- Index(es):