Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2


"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:d89h2v$ng5$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> sue jahn wrote:
> > When Albert Einstein writes:
> >
> > <<
> > As *judged* from K, the clock is moving with the velocity v;
> > as judged from this reference-body, the time which elapses
> > between two strokes of the clock is not one second, but
> >
> > http://www.bartleby.com/173/M5.GIF (equation)
> >
> > seconds, i.e. a somewhat larger time. As a consequence
> > of its motion the clock *goes* more slowly than when at rest.
> > >>
> > http://www.bartleby.com/173/12.html
> >
> > are we not obliged to immediately attach the imaginary
> > operator i ?
>
> No.

Ah!
You are one of the fortunate ones who can run a few appliances
for free from the apparent power in your home's induction motors.

Here:
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_2/chpt_11/2.html
This'll keep you out of trouble today. :o)

Sue...


>
> Paul



.

Relevant Pages

  • Design a clock that *goes* as it is *judged* [over a variable length path]
    ... judged from this reference-body, the time which elapses between ... two strokes of the clock is not one second, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
    ... > sue jahn wrote: ... >> When Albert Einstein writes: ... >> as judged from this reference-body, the time which elapses ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
    ... > as judged from this reference-body, the time which elapses ... > between two strokes of the clock is not one second, ... > of its motion the clock *goes* more slowly than when at rest. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
    ... As *judged* from K, the clock is moving with the velocity v; as judged from this reference-body, the time which elapses between two strokes of the clock is not one second, but ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)