Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2


"Spoonfed" <jonathan.doolin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1118435212.927622.258850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> sue jahn wrote:
> > When Albert Einstein writes:
> >
> > <<
> > As *judged* from K, the clock is moving with the velocity v;
> > as judged from this reference-body, the time which elapses
> > between two strokes of the clock is not one second, but
> >
> > http://www.bartleby.com/173/M5.GIF (equation)
> >
> > seconds, i.e. a somewhat larger time. As a consequence
> > of its motion the clock *goes* more slowly than when at rest.
> > >>
> > http://www.bartleby.com/173/12.html
> >
> > are we not obliged to immediately attach the imaginary
> > operator i ?
>
>
> You ARE kidding, right? You know that's a 1, not an I.

Yes..
The i is here:
http://www.bartleby.com/173/a2.html

Sue...

>
> <Snip>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
    ... > sue jahn wrote: ... >> as judged from this reference-body, the time which elapses ... >> between two strokes of the clock is not one second, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Imagine i , j, (-1)^-2
    ... When Albert Einstein writes: ... the clock is moving with the velocity v; ... as judged from this reference-body, the time which elapses ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)