Re: gyroscope levitation based on fluid or particle accelerators

cirejcon wrote:
> uucp wrote:
> > PD wrote:
> > > frog wrote:
> > > > can a small particle accelerator
> > > > accelerate so much that the accelerating
> > > > tube will act as an gyroscope and start
> > > > levitating? can it be don
> > > >
> > > > at least in theory should be possible
> > > >
> > > > how much mass need to fly making the
> > > > tube levitating?
> > >
> > > First of all, gyroscopes don't levitate. They don't tip over, but
> > > there's a good reason for that. They don't their center of mass off the
> > > ground.
> >
> > i saw somewhere that they can
> >
> > the center of mass is at least displaced, the
> > gyro is almost flying
> >
> > take a look at the suspending rod, completly vertical
> >
> > http://www.wfu.edu/Academic-departments/Physics/demolabs/demos/avimov/mechanics/gyroscope/bicycle_wheel.MPG
> >
> > but this is maybe only becus they dont know physics
> >
>
> I think you posted the wrong film. When I clicked on it,
> the gyroscope was suspended by a string which someone was holding,
> no "levitation" involved.
>
> Please repost the one that shows levitation.

it was the right link moron, look here stoopid

the first sentence was about a TV clip, bitch,
on discovery and other channels

the second sentence was the answer to PD postulate
that the center of mass is no afected by gyros, you moron

learn to read bitch


>
>
> >
> > >
> > > Secondly, the amount of mass that is going around in a particle
> > > accelerator is incredibly small. The amount of mass that spun even in a
> > > child's toy gyroscope generates trillions the amount of angular
> > > momentum that is bound up in a particle accelerator.
> >
> > but acording to relativity pushing the particles
> > faster their mass increase to infinity, no
> > matter the amount
> >
>
> Learn some math, then learn some physics.

maybe you should teach me how to make love
with your mother if she looks good

> One of the most
> intense particle beams in the world is the SNS, being built
> at OAK ridge. This will circulate 1.5x10^14 protons at
> 1 GeV of kinetic energy (.876c). The radius is about 40 meters.
> If you plug in all the numbers, this works out to ~.005 kg-m^2/s,
> of TOTAL angular momentum, far less than the spinning bicycle wheel
> in your picture.

cut the crap moron, it about fluids not only about
accelerated particles, fok yo very much

>
> Although, in fairness, it is more than a trillion times less
> than a child's top.
>
> -jc

have you somthin to contribute to the issue you
superautoinflated piece of ***?

>
>
> > >
> > > PD

.

Quantcast