Re: complex numbers
- From: The TimeLord <mathnphysics-not@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:43:28 -0500
Don Giovanni <laterel0328@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<1118580874.108666.125200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Sunday 12 June
2005 07:54 posted to sci.physics.relativity:
> i never understod whay complex
> number only have two dimenssion,
> the real and imaginary part
>
>
> whay not more?
Actually they don't have two dimensions either. A dimension is defined as
the number of linearly independent basis vectors that span a space. I know
that sounds trite, but my point is that in understanding things like
complex numbers, you need to understand how mathematicians define things.
So, a complex number is a number that when multiplied by itself equals a
real number. As long as the real number is positive, another real will do
as in Sqrt[4]=+-2; both real. If the real is negative then you get the
imaginary part as in Sqrt[-4]=+-2i.
So then, the answer to your question is that real numbers can be positive or
negative, so you need both real and imaginary parts of complex numbers to
describe them. The real part describes the square root of the positive and
the imaginary part describes the square root of the negative.
To really get a feel for this, consider...
i = Sqrt[-1]
So i^2 = -1
So i^4 = 1
But
Sqrt[1] = +-1
So Sqrt[i^4] = +-1
So i^2 = +-1 since Sqrt[i^4]=(i^4)^(1/2)
You can see that unless you keep straight just what the square root is
defined to be, you can go very far afield by continuing the square roots to
result in i=1, which is nonsense. Same way with the nature of a complex
number.
This probably doesn't help, but I thought I'd give it a shot anyway.
--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens and they are us!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: complex numbers
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: complex numbers
- From: jem
- Re: complex numbers
- References:
- complex numbers
- From: Don Giovanni
- complex numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: From first principles
- Next by Date: cgs vs mks; was h-bar=e^2/e0c
- Previous by thread: Re: complex numbers
- Next by thread: Re: complex numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|