Re: complex numbers
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:21:31 -0700
Dear jem:
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FVere.91014$sy6.84187@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The TimeLord wrote:
....
>> You can see that unless you keep straight just what
>> the square root is defined to be,
>
> Sqrt() is defined to be a function so e.g. Sqrt(1) = 1,
> not +-1, and of course i^2 = -1, not +-1.
sqrt() may be defined by programming languages to be "the
positive square root", allowing the programmer to assign whatever
sign(s) the programmer chooses. But the result of the square
root is bivalued (except for sqrt(0) ). sqrt(-1) is the
conundrum, i^2 is the solution. And note that +/-i *is* a
solution, and valid result.
David A. Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: complex numbers
- From: jem
- Re: complex numbers
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: complex numbers
- References:
- complex numbers
- From: Don Giovanni
- Re: complex numbers
- From: The TimeLord
- Re: complex numbers
- From: jem
- complex numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
- Next by Date: Re: complex numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: complex numbers
- Next by thread: Re: complex numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|