Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?


"*** rD" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1118668503.3762.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Kfbre.15358$F7.2198@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> |
> | "Russell E. Rierson" <analog57@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | news:1118647568.660942.326090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[snip]

> | > By saying that we can never completely quantify Reality, is to admit
> | > that is also continuous.
>
> I like it.

Many idiots really like whatever they see :-)

>
> |
> | And the connection of your philosophical meanderings to relativity is?
> |
> | Bill
>
> That I like it and that the quantification via mathematics has the same
> limitation and attributes and c is as a stepping stone in our quantification
> of existence.

But you can't even check a simple equation:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/HowCheck.html
Now, that is what I call funny :-)

Dirk Vdm


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
    ... Inside the scope of quantification, ... and you seem to be saying exactly the same ... The distinction between truth and provability, ... ridiculous howling error, but it is not the particular tremendously ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: [9fans] parallel systems
    ... The issue here is that all the things you are saying can be (and have ... There are variations in just ... This type of discussion, absent some sort of quantification, belongs ... akin to arguing about power without knowing what terms like volts and ...
    (comp.os.plan9)
  • Re: Alan Turings Halting Problem is incorrectly formed
    ... > which involves quantification over sentences (or propositions). ... >Are you saying this is not possible also then? ... Daryl McCullough ...
    (sci.logic)
Quantcast