Re: One approach for SR.


Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
> "Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1118783638.694532.184450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Gerald L. O'Barr (globarr) comments:
> > There is a series of posts going on, on this
> > net, where they are talking past each other.
> >
> > See: Lorentz transforms physical incoherence
> >
> > They are using simple algebra, but they are
> > missing many important points as they try to apply
> > this algebra.
>
> Yes, you have a keen eye! That is exactly what Marcel
> Luttgens is doing on that thread. Unlike you, Marcel
> can handle simple algebra. He does not know what the
> variables mean, but that is of course of no importance
> whatsoever for Marcel. We have been explaining what
> these weird symbols x and t are supposed to represent,
> but during the last 5 years Marcel has effectively managed
> not to understand it.
> Thanks for having raised this point.
>
> Dirk Vdm

xxein: Your backhanded comment about Gerald's competence of 'simple
algebra' misses his point that the algebra can be simpler-still if you
have the right working concept. Apparently you cannot understand or
subscribe to anything Lorentz except the eventual math equality. Math
is not the physics, the correct physical concept is.

Lorentz was short-sighted wrt gravity and cosmology to be sure. That's
why he capitulated to the Einsteinian math/geometry. But, again, that
is a concept born of math and not the methodology that this universe
uses as its physic.

There are concepts that put the physical substance to a simple math.
And, sure, a more complex math can describe it in more efficient terms
--- but those terms are usually limited to subjectively measured
relational values rather than the actual overall physics of the
situation at large.

Didn't you ever wonder why cosmology, GR and quantum theories never
seem to unify? I'll give you a hint. They are close - right? They do
not share the same concept that the universe uses. It's simple -
change the concepts!

What? You refuse? Well I can't force you. But the question remains
as to whether you have the will and brainpower. From what I read of
you, you don't have that capacity.

To be fair, I cannot penetrate all of the finer structures of this
universe, but I surely can recognize (with confidence) how the accepted
theories and their respective notions of fineness have gone wrong. I
am only one step ahead, but it is a rather large step. It involves
taking each fineness and providing a concept that unifies them. It is
working well but more fineness is out there. We (colloq.) don't have
the concept to look for that data yet.

That is the difference between us. I know better than to accept a
theory as a social point of belief. The universe appears to change
conditions but the intrinsic laws remain the same. That is the
difference between a perception of reality and the ultimate reality -
the next fineness we might hope to understand.

I don't expect that but a few might understand this posting. To those
that do - get to work. To those that don't - continue licking your
balls.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: American Family Association on Santorum
    ... >> English and Math. ... >> math (to the level of Calculus) as a language through which one can ... > and another 40-50% in 8-9th grade intermediate algebra. ... tangible, real-world physics problems. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: American Family Association on Santorum
    ... Grace Haliburton wrote: ... >>>English and Math. ... >>start in 7th-grade begining algebra, ... > tangible, real-world physics problems. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: post prandial indicator 1,5 anhydroglucitol
    ... good teachers?), the math that should accompany it was often difficult ... Then I took chemistry and we used lots of algebra. ... It dawned on me that part of my problem with math had been the ... I found algebra very hard to understand until the physics ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: Is the speed of light really constant ?
    ... No, actually quite the opposite, a love of math runs in my family. ... past Algebra was Trigonometry. ... Now I'm 55, and a grandmother, but my interest in physics has just grown ... denying a female the right to study them. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Career advice needed.
    ... who post here semiregularly are full professors at math or physics ... provide help to a deserving aspiring student. ... I do know of several cases of a Math graduate program accepting ... study these prereqs on your own from books (by paying a yearly fee you ...
    (sci.physics.research)