Re: complex numbers
- From: "Hylander" <john.gagon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Jun 2005 19:24:15 -0700
Don Giovanni wrote:
> i never understod whay complex
> number only have two dimenssion,
> the real and imaginary part
>
>
> whay not more?
imaginary numbers exist because of negative numbers. Why is there the
false dilemma of only positive and negative numbers? Why not a third
designation besides "positive" and "negative"? Why negative numbers at
all? These are all "constructs" of modelling I suppose that can create
it's own mystery out of connotations that are really quite normal in
reality.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: complex numbers
- From: Robert Kolker
- Re: complex numbers
- References:
- complex numbers
- From: Don Giovanni
- complex numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Uncertainty and Continuity?
- Next by Date: Re: complex numbers
- Previous by thread: To Don Giovanni; was Re: complex numbers
- Next by thread: Re: complex numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
