Re: 2D

In article <1118847573.306021.55450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Hylander" <john.gagon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>we know 1D (time) and 3D (space). Is there anything / concept that is
>2D? Since 4D is more useful in things like big bang and black holes and
>coordinates for spacetime curvature in the presence of gravity....does
>2D map to anything or describe anything? Perhaps at smaller quantum
>scales since the coordinates for things at that level are not so clear?
>Does String Theory deal with this 2D like it does 4D? Is it possible
>that 10D = 1+2+3+4D? (a second "4D" in there?)
>
>John
>(reading a book on dimensions and another book on the various theories
>of the universe/big bang/open vs closed/topographics etc.)

First off, you'll never understand dimensions by reading books on
physics, especially relativity books. Relativists have no clue as to
what a dimension is. They believe a dimension can be curled up into a
tiny ball! It's pathetic.

Second, time is not a dimension; it is an evolution parameter used in
describing change. Time cannot change because to describe change in
time would require a meta-time, and a meta-meta-time for the
meta-time, ad infinitum.

Third, a dimension is not "out there". A dimension is a degree of
freedom used to separate/locate particles. It means that every
particle has a variable positional property. It is not the property of
space because space does not exist. Only particles exist. In a 1D
universe, every particle would have only one coordinate variable. In a
4D universe, every particle has four coordinate properties.

Fourth, the universe is 4-dimensional. There are only four degrees of
freedom, no more and no less, and none of them is temporal. There is a
simple logical reason for only four dimensions but I cannot divulge it
here. I will do so when I publish my findings. Real soon now. :-)

Go to:

Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics:
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Crackpots/notorious.htm

and

More Nasty Little Truths About Physics:
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Crackpots/nasty.htm

ahaha...

Louis Savain

The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Quantum Plurality and Individuality 3
    ... >>From Osher Doctorow ... Branes do qualify as "particle generalizations" since they are ... might be that the whole higher dimension or second universe is composed ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: QED and the speed of light
    ... >A particle at rest has no momentum but it has energy. ... something circling in a small circle using an extra dimension + time. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • the Euler-Lagrange
    ... a particle of mass m that moves in one dimension ... such that it has Lagrangian ...
    (sci.physics)
  • the Euler-Lagrange equation
    ... a particle of mass m that moves in one dimension ... such that it has Lagrangian ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Getting out of this world?
    ... dimension one's body has no extension into. ... It's trying to put the destination into a theory, ... Why do you assume the other universe is lacking something ... Wormholes don't sound like something someone could build here. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)
Quantcast