Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:12:34 GMT
"The TimeLord" <mathnphysics-not@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:g8CdnV0dMoLBBS3fRVn-og@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> AllYou! <idaman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> <fNadneMvJeAxyS3fRVn-2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Wednesday 15 June 2005 11:18
> posted to sci.physics.relativity:
>
> > Most either chose not to respond to the guy, or to give some sort of
> > substantive
> > response. But how does the guy with no self-respect reply?
> >
> > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> > in message news:x3Sre.121086$U91.6971438@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> You are a complete idiot.
> >
> > The bitter, pathetic, old man continues his ways.
>
> That's why I've learned to ignore him.
That is severely contradicted by evidence on another thread.
Your attention span seems to be very limited :-)
Dirk Vdm
.
- References:
- Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
- From: Curious
- Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
- From: AllYou!
- Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
- From: The TimeLord
- Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
- Prev by Date: Re: complex numbers
- Next by Date: Re: complex numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
- Next by thread: Re: Acceleration proves absolute frame of reference
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|