Re: 2D
Hylander wrote:
> Traveler wrote:
> > In article <1118847573.306021.55450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > "Hylander" <john.gagon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
xxein: In reading your thread thus far, I have no doubt that you have
a pretty good grasp of the physical situation and the myriad (mostly
mathematical) concepts that accompany it.
1D is only a self-referential point, 2D is planar with a separation and
3D is the composite of planes and separations. There are no more
places except that time exists(which indicates a movement or event).
Clearly, time describes an on-off existence at a place, but it also is
the continuum connecting places of existence through comparisons of
different on-off states or 'movements'. It remains arbitrary whether a
place moves with time (so says Einstein - in so many words).
The only other thing I can suggest is a study of self-symmetry at
different scales (Mandlebrot and/or Julia sets - or more). I am not
sure of that relation to string theories, but it seems that it may be
found to be applicable.
Only your hair-dresser knows for sure.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Melnballs
... However, I can grasp, for example, the essential ideas behind our current technology of space-flight, even if I am hazy on pretty much all of the details. ... Such inability does not disprove the existence of Saturn V's or the space shuttle, any more than our inability to comprehend the infinite disproves anything. ...
(uk.rec.sheds) - Re: For All x
... The domain D is itself a set, yet its existence is ... Axioms 2 &3) together imply that D is infinite and a separate Axiom ... So, we have a choice, we either accept full fledged separation, and a ... But it is impossible to "postulate the existence" of any D of a theory ...
(sci.logic) - Re: Resolving the paradoxes of set theory
... What I mean by "notational convenience" is that any closed formula ... I'm not sure what you mean by saying that the power set axiom ... If f and x are sets, then so is x' by separation. ... >This is NOT going to automatically entail existence of any terms. ...
(sci.logic) - Re: Who here is capable of a rational discussion of Chi?
... you cannot grasp so must go to any length to refuse it's existence. ... cultural or intellectual capacity to grasp a complex abstract concept. ... The concensus view is that you're a fucking idiot, and this could well be the case. ... If memory serves me, it was the big fat dude and his pals who believed in their version of chi, and as the blood ceased circulating around their tiny brains, their chi was nowhere to be found. ...
(rec.martial-arts) - Re: Question about the Diagonal Method.
... So the axiom schema of separation was created to deny ... existence to sets like A but allows sets like B. For this example, ...
(sci.logic) |
|
