Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
- From: "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:50:20 GMT
"tontoko" <gooday@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1119701356.376094.301050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Even the diagonal of a square of unit size?
>
> Anyway we have to approximate the square root by rational number if it
> is irrational.
We do not have to approximate sqrt 2 any more than we need to approximate
the rational number 1/googolplex - yet both would be intractable to exact
manipulation. It is the choice of doing tractable calculations that
determines if we approximate anything.
> Can you state every figure of square root of 2?
Can you write down all the digits of the decimal expansion of the rational
number - 1/googolplex?
>
> >Since it can be made any value at all depending on units shown it is
> >obviously neither rational or irrational.
>
> Mathematically the number in Q(c) is expressed as x = a+bc where a and
> b are rational numbers and c is irrational number.
In natural units c = 1 thus your b would be 0.
Bill
.
- References:
- Relativistic Complex Analysis
- From: tontoko
- Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
- From: tontoko
- Relativistic Complex Analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: Relativity and Clocks
- Previous by thread: Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
- Next by thread: Re: Relativistic Complex Analysis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|