Re: Hammond Unable to Answer Eickmeier Anti-SPOG
- From: "Randy M. Dumse" <rmd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:03:16 -0500
"Gary Eickmeier" <geickmei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jXyve.167434$IO.116542@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Then there is the PFF, or Picture Fusion Frequency.
The PFF argument is falacious. PFF is a measure of how fast pictures
must be flashed before the look like continuous motion to the mind. Put
another way, how fast must a flase reality be flashed before it tricks
the mind into seeing a false reality.
Younger observers are more likely to see the false reality as real,
while older observers are more likely to reject the false reality as
just a series of still pictures, and not actual motion of a real scene.
So PFF is not a measure of seeing reality, it is a measure of how hard
it is to deceive the mind into believing in a false reality.
--
Randy M. Dumse
Caution: Objects in mirror are more confused than they appear.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hammond Unable to Answer Eickmeier Anti-SPOG
- From: Gary Eickmeier
- Re: Hammond Unable to Answer Eickmeier Anti-SPOG
- References:
- Hammond Unable to Answer Eickmeier Anti-SPOG
- From: Gary Eickmeier
- Hammond Unable to Answer Eickmeier Anti-SPOG
- Prev by Date: Hammond Unable to Answer Eickmeier Anti-SPOG
- Next by Date: Re: Speed of light in medium constant?
- Previous by thread: Hammond Unable to Answer Eickmeier Anti-SPOG
- Next by thread: Re: Hammond Unable to Answer Eickmeier Anti-SPOG
- Index(es):