sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Jan Bielawski
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Another Hurdle for LeSagian Theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: modelling a hole
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The bag is out of the cat.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: vergon_enterprises
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• The bag is out of the cat.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: photon stuff...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY
  • From: Eugen Negut
• Re: photon stuff...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: modelling a hole
  • From: Aristotle
• Another Hurdle for LeSagian Theory
  • From: TC
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: bz
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Bilge
• Re: photon stuff...
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• photon stuff...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What are String Theories Laws? What Are String Thoery's Postulates? Has String Theory Accomplished Anything? How Much Has String Theory Cost Us?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity concerns
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity concerns
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: vergon_enterprises
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: vanep
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: bz
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: Kim B
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: topological equivalence?
  • From: ajiko
• Re: topological equivalence?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: relativity concerns
  • From: @echo off
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: bz
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• topological equivalence?
  • From: ajiko
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativity concerns
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Space-time curvature
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: a question on the relativity of lengths and times (need help)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: bz
• Space-time curvature
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: a question on the relativity of lengths and times (need help)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a question on the relativity of lengths and times (need help)
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: a question on the relativity of lengths and times (need help)
  • From: PD
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: a question on the relativity of lengths and times (need help)
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: a question on the relativity of lengths and times (need help)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a question on the relativity of lengths and times (need help)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: bz
• Re: a question on the relativity of lengths and times (need help)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR ?
  • From: bz
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Androcles
• a question on the relativity of lengths and times (need help)
  • From: francisco
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: bz
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: bz
• Re: angels and devils theory
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What are String Theories Laws? What Are String Thoery's Postulates? Has String Theory Accomplished Anything? How Much Has String Theory Cost Us?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: CajunDick
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: CajunDick
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: J. Horta
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: vanep
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: vanep
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Simple Sagnac
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Simple Sagnac
  • From: sal
• Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: jem
• Re: angels and devils theory
  • From: jem
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Helical Particle Waves.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: GOD=G_uv GOD = CPU SPEED
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: vanep
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: angels and devils theory
  • From: James Baugh
• Re: Why relativity is infalsifiable
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: GOD=G_uv GOD = CPU SPEED
  • From: bv_schornak
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: Eugene Shubert
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: vanep
• Re: gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: Eugene Shubert
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: GOD=G_uv GOD = CPU SPEED
  • From: TMG
• Re: GOD=G_uv GOD = CPU SPEED
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Bilge Can Improve!
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: J. Horta
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Why relativity is infalsifiable
  • From: Bilge
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: xxein
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: J. Horta
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: J. Horta
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: xxein
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What are String Theories Laws? What Are String Thoery's Postulates? Has String Theory Accomplished Anything? How Much Has String Theory Cost Us?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What are String Theories Laws? What Are String Thoery's Postulates? Has String Theory Accomplished Anything? How Much Has String Theory Cost Us?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: the funny electron
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ignatius of Loyola and Science Education
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GOD=G_uv: HAMMOND YAWNS AT HECKLERS
  • From: Edward Cherlin
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: vanep
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: vanep
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: J. Horta
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: vanep
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: J. Horta
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: J. Horta
• Re: stopping time
  • From: Bilge
• Re: gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why relativity is infalsifiable
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Some electromagnetic history
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: vanep
• Re: What are String Theories Laws? What Are String Thoery's Postulates? Has String Theory Accomplished Anything? How Much Has String Theory Cost Us?
  • From: Chris
• Re: gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: Chris
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: dark matter / energy is voodoo science = crappy math
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: vanep
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GOD=G_uv GOD = CPU SPEED
  • From: TMG
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: bz
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: vanep
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GOD=G_uv GOD = CPU SPEED
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Why relativity is infalsifiable
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: @echo off
• Re: gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Why relativity is infalsifiable
  • From: Bilge
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: randamajor
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Ignatius of Loyola and Science Education
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Why relativity is infalsifiable
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 100 years of wrong relativity
  • From: dwhig265
• gravity at the center of a black hole
  • From: verify on
• Re: What are String Theories Laws? What Are String Thoery's Postulates? Has String Theory Accomplished Anything? How Much Has String Theory Cost Us?
  • From: Immortalist
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: in silence
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: in silence
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: in silence
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: dark matter / energy is voodoo science = crappy math
  • From: vic
• Re: About GR (kst)
  • From: Sue...
• About GR (kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: dark matter / energy is voodoo science = crappy math
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: Time
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Time
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: vic
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Bilge
• the earth from space
  • From: vic
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: vic
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: vanep
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: vic
• Re: 100 years of wrong relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: How can this work in relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• How can this work in relativity?
  • From: dseppala
• Re: dark matter / energy is voodoo science = crappy math
  • From: vic
• Re: dark matter / energy is voodoo science = crappy math
  • From: vic
• Re: stopping time
  • From: vic
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: stopping time
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: 100 years of wrong relativity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: dark matter / energy is voodoo science = crappy math
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why relativity is infalsifiable
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: dark matter / energy is voodoo science = crappy math
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: E = mc2 paradox
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: vanep
• Re: 100 years of wrong relativity
  • From: ultimate energy
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox
  • From: maxqubit
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• dark matter / energy is voodoo science = crappy math
  • From: in silence
• Re: 100 years of wrong relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Time
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Time
  • From: in silence
• 100 years of wrong relativity
  • From: in silence
• Re: Time
  • From: sue jahn
• The Foul Mouthed Mr Stepp
  • From: Ssecca
• Re: Welcome back Androcles
  • From: Androcles
• Welcome back Androcles
  • From: St.M
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• stopping time
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: google
• Re: A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• A way to measure OWLS...and verify the constancy of the one way speed of light
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Re: Time
  • From: TomGee
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: GR ?
  • From: vic
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: vic
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GOD=G_uv GOD = CPU SPEED
  • From: TMG
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Time
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: in silence
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: vic
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Do light-clocks go as judged ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Klaus Kassner
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: vic
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: Bill Rowe
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: curvature mapping
  • From: vic
• Re: curvature mapping
  • From: xxein
• curvature mapping
  • From: vic
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: vic
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: vic
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Bilge, deal with the æther's fixed waves as air's fixed waves
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: looking for Eckart Colsman
  • From: Zdenek Sperling
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• looking for Eckart Colsman
  • From: Zdenek Sperling
• Looking for Eckart Colsman
  • From: Zdenek Sperling
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Can an Aetherist Explain This to Me, Please.
  • From: Sue...
• the elegant universe
  • From: dinunno@xxxxxxxxx
• If there exists some D>C ,still the principles of relativity will hold true..!
  • From: alertjean
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox
  • From: xxein
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Back ground radiation temperature vs. word age
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: vic
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: vic
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Bilge
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: George Hammond's Latest Tactic Fails Miserably
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Esaelp
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Bilge
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: Bilge
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Bilge
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: vic
• Some electromagnetic history
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Back ground radiation temperature vs. word age
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Back ground radiation temperature vs. word age
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Back ground radiation temperature vs. word age
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Nick
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: RichD
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: bz
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: RichD
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: RichD
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Wugi
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Nick
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: randamajor
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: randamajor
• Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: womens and relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• womens and relativity
  • From: vic
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: vic
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: vic
• Re: Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Is Action fun ??(kst)
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Expansion or Earth
  • From: Bilge
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: string theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: YBM
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Bilge
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: YBM
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: YBM
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Nether (Dynamic Ether) Theory of Lew Price
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: YBM
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: YBM
• Re: hawking radiation baloney!
  • From: Nick
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: dwhig265
• space between electrons and nuclei
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Time
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: johnboy
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: vic
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vic
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: vic
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: hawking radiation baloney!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: entropy in relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: bz
• Dynamic Ether equals Dynamic Dimensions
  • From: Nick
• Re: Dynamic Ether equals Dynamic Dimensions
  • From: sue jahn
• Nether (Dynamic Ether) Theory of Lew Price
  • From: marcelomjr
• Re: Nether (Dynamic Ether) Theory of Lew Price
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: tttpppggg
• Re: Albert Einstein quotes--Is it true?
  • From: xxein
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: string theory
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• hawking radiation baloney!
  • From: Nick
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: xxein
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: MMX Null Result Was Inevitable.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Nonlocality, EPR, "Spooky" Action at a Distance Explained by Moving Dimensions Theory
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Eli Botkin
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: YBM
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Spacetime is where Maxwell radiates
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: entropy in relativity
  • From: puppet_sock
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: bz
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• string theory
  • From: chirag singhal
• string theory
  • From: chirag singhal
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: bz
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: hawking radiation
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• hawking radiation
  • From: gsax
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: gsax
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• relativity of simultaneity
  • From: gsax
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Albert Einstein quotes--Is it true?
  • From: R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Expansion or Earth
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Jan Bielawski
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: An 'Absolute' Reference Frame?
  • From: YBM
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: bz
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Time
  • From: AllYou!
• scientists are failures (Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: An 'Absolute' Reference Frame?
  • From: Harry
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Pulaid
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Spacetime is where Maxwell radiates
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: entropy in relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Bilge
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Harry
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: vax
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• MMX Null Result Was Inevitable.
  • From: Max Keon
• entropy in relativity
  • From: gsax
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: entropy in relativity
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: time-edited
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: DZ
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: time-edited
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• time-edited
  • From: dinunno
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Bilge
• Time
  • From: dinunno
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: sal
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An 'Absolute' Reference Frame?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: xxein
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Jan Bielawski
• Re: An 'Absolute' Reference Frame?
  • From: YBM
• Re: An 'Absolute' Reference Frame?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: YBM
• Re: water inside a black hole
  • From: xxein
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: YBM
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Don Giovanni
• water inside a black hole
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: YBM
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: YBM
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Daniel Weston
• relativity is like Linux
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: relativity is like Linux
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Expansion or Earth
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Expansion or Earth
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: An educational road to QED?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• blackhole physics of Stephen Hawking is wrong
  • From: relativitybeyondeinstein
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• An educational road to QED?
  • From: dzkalman
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: EL
• Re: Inside a black hole
  • From: Nick
• Inside a black hole
  • From: RichD
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Orthokinetic Aggregation and Cosmology
  • From: Pat Flannery
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: EL
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: EL
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Is light massless?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: randamajor
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: jem
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: jem
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Harry
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: why should I care
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: EL
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: why should I care
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Bilge, Atomic General Relativity, need yak!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Nonlocality, EPR, "Spooky" Action at a Distance Explained by Moving Dimensions Theory
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Nonlocality, EPR, "Spooky" Action at a Distance Explained by Moving Dimensions Theory
  • From: jollyrogership
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions
  • From: EL
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: jem
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: M D Meenken
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: M D Meenken
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Fundamental Definitions
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Fundamental Definitions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GR ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions
  • From: EL
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: why should I care
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Who Is "Nth Complexity"?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: multiple Gs ... 2G, 3G ...etc
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: why should I care
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: why should I care
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: multiple Gs ... 2G, 3G ...etc
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: why should I care
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Question about light clock - Part II
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Sycophancy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Non Ame
• Re: why should I care
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A Snapshot of a Photon
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Non Ame
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: EL
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Don Giovanni
• multiple Gs ... 2G, 3G ...etc
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: Non Ame
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: relativity of simultaneity - real or perceived?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: why should I care
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The Theory of Moving Dimensions: 5+ Year History Of Theory
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• GR ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Sycophancy
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: why should I care
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Frames of refrence
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Frames of refrence
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• why should I care
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Frames of refrence
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: photon followups
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Fundamental Definitions
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Fundamental Definitions
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Fundamental Definitions
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: nuclear weapons and gravity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Fundamental Definitions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is light massless?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Fundamental Definitions
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: nuclear weapons and gravity
  • From: online
• Fundamental Definitions
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: David Evens
• Re: nuclear weapons and gravity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• nuclear weapons and gravity
  • From: bytheseainla
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Is light massless?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is light massless?
  • From: ajiko
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is light massless?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Is light massless?
  • From: pshoi
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Searching for text of Einstein's Anti-McCarthy letter
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Searching for text of Einstein's Anti-McCarthy letter
  • From: Andreas Schlenger
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Harry
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Harry
• Re: photon followups
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Harry
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Harry
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: xxein
• photon followups
  • From: rst
• Re: The Best Way to Learn Special Relativity
  • From: xxein
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: xxein
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: rst
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: johnreed take 17
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: sal
• johnreed take 17
  • From: randamajor
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Kim B
• Re: GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Einstein Had a Poor Understanding of His Own Theories
  • From: Daniel Weston
• GRT and higher order effects?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Will the LIGO Experiment Work?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: Einstein Had a Poor Undersanding of His Own Theories
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Electo London Gravity ?
  • From: sue jahn
• Light unaffected by matters motion?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Nick
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Bilge, Atomic General Relativity, need yak!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein Had a Poor Undersanding of His Own Theories
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: David Evens
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: johnreed take 16
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Bilge, Atomic General Relativity, need yak!
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: xxein
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: thomaswp
• Re: johnreed take 16
  • From: randamajor
• Re: johnreed take 16
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Bilge, Atomic General Relativity, need yak!
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: newsrudy
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Constancy of the Light Speed !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Dan
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: Dan
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Tachyons
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Design a clock that *goes* as it is *judged* [over a variable length path]
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Design a clock that *goes* as it is *judged* [over a variable length path]
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Design a clock that *goes* as it is *judged* [over a variable length path]
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Tom Capizzi
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Design a clock that *goes* as it is *judged* [over a variable length path]
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Design a clock that *goes* as it is *judged* [over a variable length path]
  • From: Androcles
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Androcles
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: rst
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: thomaswp
• Re: SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: thomaswp
• Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll
  • From: Bill Hobba
• SR experts - help with simple circuit
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: vanep
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Kim B
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: angels and devils theory
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: ttdaomd
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?
  • From: Button
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: jem
• Re: angels and devils theory
  • From: jem
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Harry
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Harry
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Sue...
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: rst
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: Perspicacious
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: thomaswp
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: The existence of physics ?
  • From: Significant Zero
• Re: Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: sue jahn
• Guard and Driver - time difference
  • From: thomaswp
• Design a clock that *goes* as it is *judged* [over a variable length path]
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: David Park
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: EL
• Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
  • From: john_doe_ph_d
• Re: relativity question
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: Big Crunch
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll
  • From: Bilge
• Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: vanep
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Classical transverse Doppler effect
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Eli Botkin
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Eli Botkin
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Sue...
• Re: if you dare to answer to bilge the troll
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Tachyons
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: angels and devils theory
  • From: James Baugh
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• if you dare to answer to bilge the troll
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Aristotle
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Barry
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: A GRAND ILLUSION OF PHOTONS
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Synthetic Telepathy and Tachyons
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: Where Remains the Energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Where Remains the Energy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Recommend a Newbie book to relativity ?
  • From: Bill Rowe
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Eli Botkin
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Where Remains the Energy
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: E = mc2 paradox
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: E = mc2 paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: E = mc2 paradox
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: kk
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Where Remains the Energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: E = mc2 paradox
  • From: sue jahn
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: kk
• Re: Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: E = mc2 paradox
  • From: snapdragon31
• Proper Time v. Absolute Motion.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: kk
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: kk
• Re: E = mc2 paradox
  • From: Sue...
• E = mc2 paradox
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Bilge
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Where Remains the Energy
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: stoooopid bilge
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: AllYou!
• stoooopid bilge
  • From: Don Giovanni
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Where Remains the Energy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where Remains the Energy
  • From: Harry
• Re: Where Remains the Energy
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Astronomy Hub - The International Astronomy and Space Forum Community
  • From: astrohub
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Bilge
• Where Remains the Energy
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Have you ever wondered.....
  • From: Kees Roos
• Re: johnreed take 16
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: johnreed take 16
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 16
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: johnreed take 16
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: johnreed take 16
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: johnreed take 16
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: bz
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
  • From: Arthur Dent
• Re: 100 years today!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel