Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:34:38 GMT, H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote:

>On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 05:51:49 GMT, Aristotle
><wandering_philosopher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>>Henri knows that the BaT says TWLS=OWLS =c with source and mirror mutually at
>>>rest. Henri knows that Einstein probably knew that also...becasue Ritz told
>>>him.
>>>
>>>Henri also knows how to perform one experiment that will prove the BaT.
>>>We can even use Cassini. Androcles was absent when this was proposed.
>>>
>>>All we need is a small relay receiver/transmitter on te edge of the moon.
>>>
>>>When Cassini, Earth and moon are roughly in line, we arrange for Cassini to
>>>send a sharp signal towards Earth. It will be traveling at c+v wrt Earth.
>>>As the signal passes the moon's egde, the relay station detects it and
>>>immediately (actually after a precisely known delay) emits a similar pulse
>>>towards Earth, thins time at c wrt Earth.
>>>
>>>If Cassini is orientated correctly, the two signals should arrive about ten us
>>>apart....easily detectable since they travel through the same stretch of
>>>atmosphere.
>>>If Cassini is unsuitable, a special probe can be sent up with a small pulse
>>>transmitter. Best traveling at 0.0001 c away from Earth.
>>
>>So what does Henri know about Roche limits?
>>And how come they don't apply in his Cepheid model?
>>
>>Will he answer or will he name call and talk about something else?
>
>The BaT model of a cepheid is the wobble of a largish star about which a
>neutron star or other WCH is orbiting. The wobble has some cyclic velocity in
>the direction of the observer. Roche limits apply to large spheres of gas.

No it doesnt. Study the subject more thoroughly. Your model for
Cepheids go against established CLASSICAL physics. The object
orbiting the star is well within the star's Roche limit, residing in
the Roche lobe. What this means is that if its a planet, it would
have broken up forming a ring of debris around the star. If its
another star then they would have fused into one object.

This was the problem with Delta Cepheii. The spectra could be
interpretted as two orbitting star, but the stars were well within the
Star's Roche limit. Which meant there shouldn't BE two stars.

But apparrently in universe there are.

Fine. Can you explain why these stars violate this principle that
every other celstial body, be it star, comet or planet, obeys?



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
    ... >>>Henri also knows how to perform one experiment that will prove the BaT. ... >>>We can even use Cassini. ... >>>towards Earth, thins time at c wrt Earth. ... Roche limits apply to large spheres of gas. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: OK
    ... But even if the distance was for another star ... you was still able to get the light curve of A Aur "right", ... >>And the ballistic theory predicts that telescopes doesn't ... >>Cant you still not see them puffing in and out, Henri? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: OK
    ... > precisely constant periods that are observed in relation to variable star ... Ask Paul Andersen!" ... Sure, Henri. ... I think you would find that these interference fringes are ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
    ... Henri, Henri, Henri! ... Our ears sensitivity to frequency can loosely be said to be logarithmic. ... But the statement "frequency is logarithmic" is meaningless. ... many star appear to be a lot closer than they are. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
    ... Henri, you really ought to familiarize yourself with the extensive ... In the X-ray region of the spectrum, ... It looks like a star, quacks like a star, waddles like a star... ... Unification is NOT like extinction. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading