Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 22:04:51 GMT
[This thread has lots of argument but no insight at all on the basic question....]
john_doe_ph_d@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Time dilation is typically the first SR effect derived in text books, and it is usually done with the example of a light clock as follows, [...] but I am trying to reconcile B's observation of the light path with the fact that the light source is pointed in the vertical direction. Doesn't that tell B that the light is "really" just moving up and down? Wouldn't B have to see the light source tilted to make sense of his observation of the light path?
In A's frame, the light source is pointed vertically, and the light goes up and reflects back down along the same path. In particular, the light hits the mirror at a specific point.
Viewed from B's frame, the light must hit that exact same point on the mirror, but during the time the light went from source to mirror the mirror moved horizontally, so the path of the light MUST be diagonal in B's frame. To B the light source itself is not tilted, but the path of the light inside the source certainly is -- that's just a smaller version of the same situation.
Every directional light source we have consists of basically two parts: an omnidirectional light emitter and a collimating system to impose directionality. Between these two parts, the light that gets out of the source travels vertically to A and diagonally to B; both must see the light emerge from the same point of the aperture of the collimating part of the source.
Adding a fiber optic between source and mirror does nothing to resolve this issue -- you must look INSIDE the light source.
from a conceptual point of view, I am asking how B reconciles a tilted light path with a vertical flashlight.
To B, the omindirectional emitter and the collimator are arranged vertically (as as they are to A). But to B for light to get out of the collimator it must travel diagonally inside the light source.
Tom Roberts tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: kenseto
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: john_doe_ph_d
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- References:
- Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: john_doe_ph_d
- Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Next by Date: Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Next by thread: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|