Re: Einstein Had a Poor Undersanding of His Own Theories

Traveler, the klein rectum:

>Einstein Had a Poor Undersanding of His Own Theories.
>
>He had no idea why clocks slow down or why things fall or even move.

You cluelessness is noy indicative of what einstein understood
unless you happen to be einstein. Are you claiming to be einstein?
Or, are you just another poseur?

>If your physics cannot explain these things, it's not physics; it's
>just chicken-*** math engineering. Einsteinian physics follows in the
>tradition of Newtonian mechanics. It's all math engineering with very
>little physics in between. Physics is about particles, their
>properties and their interactions. Everything else is abstract or
>voodoo, including space and time.
>
>But, it gets even worse. In 1949, Kurt "lunatic" Godel announced to
>the world that general relativity allows time travel via closed
>time-like loops. Even though this is pathetically false (nothing can
>move in spacetime), Einstein agreed with the fruitcake. In fact,
>Einstein became depressed because he felt that, even though he knew
>that time travel is illogical for a variety of reasons, why should GR,
>his crowning achievement, allow such nonsense? In other words,
>Einstein did not understand his own theory which gives credence to
>accusations that he was a mediocre plagiarizer or a puppet on a
>pedestal.
>
>The irrefutable truth is that nothing can move in spacetime and time
>does not change. This is the reason that Sir Karl Popper (of
>"falsifiability of science" fame) called spacetime, "Einstein's block
>universe in which nothing ever happens."
>
>IOW, no motion in spacetime, no geodesics, no particles curving the
>fabric of spacetime so as to cause gravity. Spacetime is a
>chicken-*** fictitious math trick in the tradition of ptolemaic
>epicycles. For a hundred years we've been fed a bunch of Star-trek
>bull*** physics by a bunch of clueless con artists. ahahaha...
>ahahahaha...
>
>So who wants to be the next Einstein? Not me. I'd rather be Archimedes
>Plutonium a thousand times over than be a gutless ass kisser.
>
>Someone recently accused me of being against GR and SR. I am not! I am
>against relativists. Certainly I think relativity is a chicken ***
>theory because it explains nothing. I am angry at the the relativist
>con artists who have managed to deceive multiple generations of young
>minds in the last century. Relativity says none of the crap they have
>claimed for it: time travel, time dilation (clock slowing) particles
>following their geodesics in spacetime, gravity being a geometric
>effect of curved spacetime, etc... It's all unmitigated crackpottery.
>
>The relativist charlatans who have held an iron grip on the
>dissemination of certain physics knowledge in the last century are in
>for rough times. This is the age of the internet and the blogs. The
>charlatans no longer have a monopoly on the dissemination of
>knowledge. People are beginning to have dissident ideas and making
>themselves heard and this bothers the con artists to no end.
>
>Illustrious Time Travel Crackpot List:
>
>Kurt Godel
>Albert Eisntein
>Kip Thorne
>Stephen Hawking
>Richard Feynman (absorber theory)
>John Wheeler (absorber theory)
>Carl Sagan
>Michio Kaku
>Brian Greene
>And many more...
>
>Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics:
>http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Crackpots/notorious.htm
>
>Louis Savain
>
>The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
>http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.

Quantcast