Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: "Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 09:46:40 +0100
"sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42ce9741$0$18636$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1120833200.30126.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:42cb8a9d$0$18640$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | "sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:42b9c325$0$18649$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
snip
| To your point. We should have no ambiguity with the far-field effects.
| Might we clear up the matter with the statements?::
| Gravitational force diminishes by 1/r^2 above the earths surface.
| Gravitational force diminishes by 1/r^1 below the earths surface.
I thought that below the surface it fell to zero at the center of the
partical at the center of the earth but still followed a 1/r^2 as far as the
feet of a person in a lift was concerned ?
|
| and from the source document:
| <<As the non-bonded interaction between atoms and groups
| involves less than full formal charge and involves polarization
| contributions, the distance dependence falls of more quickly
| than the 1/r dependence of Coulomb's law.
Coulomb's law has a 1/d^2 dependence and an electric field has 1/r^2
dependence AFAIK so where is the 1/r dependence coming from ?
| In these more
| complicated cases, where the charges can not be represented
| by single point locations, the interactions are also less isotropic,
| falling off not just as a function of distance, but also as a
| function of orientation: >>
|
| As the source document involves forces *within* some kind
| of fluid or solid, a polymer scientist probaby has little need
| for the far-field situation. 1/r^2.
|
|
| Sue...
| Pardon my careless interchange of d distance and r radius.
I thought it made no difference unless you were inside the the point source.
?
|
| > --
| > Significant Zero E-field = Electric field, M-field =Magnetic field,
two
| > unbound field effects
| > http://home.freeuk.com/paulps/
| > Maybe updates. The spuds, beans and onions are coming up nicely. Ooh
| > ah.{:-)
| >
| >
| > | ----
| > | Sue...
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- References:
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- Prev by Date: Sycophancy
- Next by Date: GR ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- Next by thread: Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- Index(es):
Loading