Re: GR ?
- From: "Bill Hobba" <bhobba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 22:57:31 GMT
"Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1120901128.24485.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Would anybody that understands GR dispute the statement that the geometry
of
> GR is non-Euclidean due deformation of length and duration under presence
> of mass and that this deformation has the aspect and equivalence to
energy?
If what you are trying to say is do gravitational fields have energy - then
I would say yes with caveats. Energy in GR is a rather slippery concept due
to the fact that energy is the conserved Noether charge related to time
symmetry of the lagrangian - it is rather difficult to define such when that
symmetry is lacking due to space-time curvature - see the FAQ -
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/energy_gr.html
Bill
>
> --
> Significant Zero E-field = Electric field, M-field =Magnetic field, two
> unbound field effects
> http://home.freeuk.com/paulps/
> Maybe updates. The spuds, beans and onions are coming up nicely. Ooh
> ah.{:-)
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: GR ?
- References:
- GR ?
- From: Significant Zero
- GR ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about light clock - Part II
- Next by Date: Re: Fundamental Definitions
- Previous by thread: GR ?
- Next by thread: Re: GR ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading