Re: GR ?

From: "M D Meenken" <mdmeenken@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:50:17 +0200

"Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:1120901128.24485.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Would anybody that understands GR dispute the statement that the geometry
> of
> GR is non-Euclidean due deformation of length and duration under presence
> of mass and that this deformation has the aspect and equivalence to
> energy?
>
> --
> Significant Zero E-field = Electric field, M-field =Magnetic field, two
> unbound field effects
> http://home.freeuk.com/paulps/
> Maybe updates. The spuds, beans and onions are coming up nicely. Ooh
> ah.{:-)

we eat them allready!
>
>

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GR ?
  - From: Significant Zero

References:
- GR ?
  - From: Significant Zero

Prev by Date: Re: Question about light clock - Part II
Next by Date: Re: Electo London Gravity ?
Previous by thread: Re: GR ?
Next by thread: Re: GR ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

GR ?
... GR is non-Euclidean due deformation of length and duration under presence ... of mass and that this deformation has the aspect and equivalence to energy? ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: GR ?
... |> GR is non-Euclidean due deformation of length and duration under ... |> of mass and that this deformation has the aspect and equivalence to ... beans and onions are coming up nicely. ...
(sci.physics.relativity)