Re: GR ?
- From: "Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:07:27 +0100
"M D Meenken" <mdmeenken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42d0ef84$0$13891$dbd49001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
| news:1120901128.24485.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > Would anybody that understands GR dispute the statement that the
geometry
| > of
| > GR is non-Euclidean due deformation of length and duration under
presence
| > of mass and that this deformation has the aspect and equivalence to
| > energy?
| >
| > --
| > Significant Zero E-field = Electric field, M-field =Magnetic field,
two
| > unbound field effects
| > http://home.freeuk.com/paulps/
| > Maybe updates. The spuds, beans and onions are coming up nicely. Ooh
| > ah.{:-)
|
| we eat them allready!
I'll take that as a qualified support and I've planted some onions and
carrots {:-) Thanks
(1-(1/(1/3))^2)/(1 + (1/(1/3))^2) = - 0.08 = FTL ? -p<+p or (m*-v)<(m*+v) or
(m*-c^2)<(m*+c^2)=g?
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Next by Date: Nonlocality, EPR, "Spooky" Action at a Distance Explained by Moving Dimensions Theory
- Previous by thread: Re: GR ?
- Next by thread: Re: GR ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
