Re: Electo London Gravity ?


"Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1121013883.18182.2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:42d0fd5a$0$18637$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
snip
> | > | > >
> | > | > > 1/r^1 = 1 so anything with 1/r^1 is an inertial ballistic object ?
> so
> | > I
> | > | > > don't know why that guy was quoting Coloumbe at 1/r below. ?
> | > |
> | > | It is the same as gravity. If you were a proton in the center of an
> | > | electron cloud half the e- minus would be on you right, half on your
> left.
> | > | If you were on the surface of the e- cloud, 100% the electrons would
> | > | be on one side of you. Same as gravity, 1/r^1 inside the cloud.
> | > | 1/r^2 as you move away from the cloud.
> | >
> | > Its not 1/r^1 see the internal gravity slope graph I mention above its
> more
> | > complex than that, inside a planet anyway. I will thing about your
> example
> | > as I don't think that equates to the field law slope inside a planet. I
> | > think your example at particle level to equate to a planet would have to
> be
> | > stating the coulomb force experienced by an electron as it burrowed into
> the
> | > centre of a proton and to make the gravity and coulomb examples parallel
> you
> | > would have to be talking about the forces experienced by a proton as it
> | > burrowed its way to a cloud of electrons which would not be 1/r but a
> | > complex slope as per gravity so the bloke who quoted 1/r below has not
> | > thought about it enough ?
> |
> | You won't like to hear this, but I am not sure protons have gravity
> either.
> | Perhap they do if we can detect FQHE.
>
> They do but it would just be a component of the charge and would probably be
> immeasurable small between two hydrogen atom ? Clue me FQHE I'm terrible
> with abbreviations sometimes.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=FQHE&btnG=Google+Search

>
> |
> | Regarding R and r
> | The mathymatishun in you, wants to see a smooth curve but see here:
> | http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/circles/u6l3e5.gif
> |
> | Missing on that graph is a nearly vertical red line representing
> | force below the surface.
>
> The force below the surface is equal to the acceleration and that is what
> that upside down tick is displaying.?
No. You need to draw a line from 0,0 up toward the
one o'clock position to meet with the highest point on the
red line.

Sorry..
I should have included some words.
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/circles/U6L3e.html

>
>
> | The equation for the entire red line is
> | probably "uglier than a mud fence covered with toads"
> | --Mark Twain
> |
> http://www.motherearthnews.com/library/1979_September_October/The_Last_Laugh
>
> You like MT {:-)

No. I just quote him a lot around durty ole men to remind 'em
that I know how to hold either end of that sword... ouch! ;o)
>
snip
> | > | > >
> | > | > > Culombio ley tiene un 1/ d^ 2 dependencia y un campo eléctrico
> tiene
> | > 1/ r^ 2
> | > | > > ¿dependencia AFAIK así donde está el 1/ r dependencia viene de?
> | > | > >
> | > | > > Can you understand that translation ?
> | > |
> | > | Absoutely! ¿ bla bal ? is spanish for
> | > | ~ bla bla ~ which is academic for
> | > | "I don't know what the f*** is am saying" :o)
> | >
> | > ¿Hace ese malo que puedo escribir chistes sucios a usted en español?

Stay where your are. The people with the good jobs and free healthcare will
be there momentairly. Pay no attention to the badges. They have been to
costume party. :o)

> | >
> | > BTW I can even write English this just my pc babbling but it can read
> some
> | > languages as well{:-)
>
> Just me being dislexic {:-) it should read
>
> BTW I cant even write English this is just my PC babbling but it can read
> some
> |languages as well{:-)

Who would have tho't someone would be a national leader of the
English speaking people that doen't even speak the languge?

<< There are two kinds of linguistic missteps, the typos and the thinkos.
Typos are the processing glitches that intercede between a thought
and its expression. They can make you look foolish, but they aren't
really the signs of an intellectual or ethical deficiency, the way thinkos
are. It's the difference between a sentence that expresses an idea
badly and a sentence that expresses a bad idea. >>
http://www-csli.stanford.edu/~nunberg/nucular.html

Sue...

>
>
>


.

Relevant Pages
Loading