Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: "Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:46:57 +0100
"sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42d162be$0$18639$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1121013883.18182.2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "sue jahn" <susysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:42d0fd5a$0$18637$14726298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| snip
| > | > | > >
| > | > | > > 1/r^1 = 1 so anything with 1/r^1 is an inertial ballistic
object ?
| > so
| > | > I
| > | > | > > don't know why that guy was quoting Coloumbe at 1/r below. ?
| > | > |
| > | > | It is the same as gravity. If you were a proton in the center of
an
| > | > | electron cloud half the e- minus would be on you right, half on
your
| > left.
| > | > | If you were on the surface of the e- cloud, 100% the electrons
would
| > | > | be on one side of you. Same as gravity, 1/r^1 inside the cloud.
| > | > | 1/r^2 as you move away from the cloud.
| > | >
| > | > Its not 1/r^1 see the internal gravity slope graph I mention above
its
| > more
| > | > complex than that, inside a planet anyway. I will thing about your
| > example
| > | > as I don't think that equates to the field law slope inside a
planet. I
| > | > think your example at particle level to equate to a planet would
have to
| > be
| > | > stating the coulomb force experienced by an electron as it burrowed
into
| > the
| > | > centre of a proton and to make the gravity and coulomb examples
parallel
| > you
| > | > would have to be talking about the forces experienced by a proton as
it
| > | > burrowed its way to a cloud of electrons which would not be 1/r but
a
| > | > complex slope as per gravity so the bloke who quoted 1/r below has
not
| > | > thought about it enough ?
| > |
| > | You won't like to hear this, but I am not sure protons have gravity
| > either.
| > | Perhap they do if we can detect FQHE.
| >
| > They do but it would just be a component of the charge and would
probably be
| > immeasurable small between two hydrogen atom ? Clue me FQHE I'm terrible
| > with abbreviations sometimes.
| http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=FQHE&btnG=Google+Search
|
| >
| > |
| > | Regarding R and r
| > | The mathymatishun in you, wants to see a smooth curve but see here:
| > | http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/circles/u6l3e5.gif
| > |
| > | Missing on that graph is a nearly vertical red line representing
| > | force below the surface.
| >
| > The force below the surface is equal to the acceleration and that is
what
| > that upside down tick is displaying.?
| No. You need to draw a line from 0,0 up toward the
| one o'clock position to meet with the highest point on the
| red line.
I have lost you here as we are debating what happens inside a planet or body
and this according to the link you gave earlier is an inverted tick and does
not match 1/r^2 or 1/r
~ acceleration inside earth
/\ surface
/
/
center
|
| Sorry..
| I should have included some words.
| http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/circles/U6L3e.html
Not really relevant below ground is it.
|
| >
| >
| > | The equation for the entire red line is
| > | probably "uglier than a mud fence covered with toads"
| > | --Mark Twain
| > |
| >
http://www.motherearthnews.com/library/1979_September_October/The_Last_Laugh
| >
| > You like MT {:-)
|
| No. I just quote him a lot around durty ole men to remind 'em
| that I know how to hold either end of that sword... ouch! ;o)
I'll read your examples more carefully then as they are presumable making a
point in that area.
| >
| snip
| > | > | > >
| > | > | > > Culombio ley tiene un 1/ d^ 2 dependencia y un campo eléctrico
| > tiene
| > | > 1/ r^ 2
| > | > | > > ¿dependencia AFAIK así donde está el 1/ r dependencia viene
de?
| > | > | > >
| > | > | > > Can you understand that translation ?
| > | > |
| > | > | Absoutely! ¿ bla bal ? is spanish for
| > | > | ~ bla bla ~ which is academic for
| > | > | "I don't know what the f*** is am saying" :o)
| > | >
| > | > ¿Hace ese malo que puedo escribir chistes sucios a usted en español?
|
| Stay where your are. The people with the good jobs and free healthcare
will
| be there momentairly. Pay no attention to the badges. They have been to
| costume party. :o)
I must decode it back into English I had no idea it would bring that
response as I thought it was just a knickers twang or it was in English{:-)
|
| > | >
| > | > BTW I can even write English this just my pc babbling but it can
read
| > some
| > | > languages as well{:-)
| >
| > Just me being dislexic {:-) it should read
| >
| > BTW I cant even write English this is just my PC babbling but it can
read
| > some
| > |languages as well{:-)
|
| Who would have tho't someone would be a national leader of the
| English speaking people that doen't even speak the languge?
|
Who are you referring to ?
| << There are two kinds of linguistic missteps, the typos and the thinkos.
| Typos are the processing glitches that intercede between a thought
| and its expression. They can make you look foolish, but they aren't
| really the signs of an intellectual or ethical deficiency, the way thinkos
| are. It's the difference between a sentence that expresses an idea
| badly and a sentence that expresses a bad idea. >>
Difficult to tell between them sometimes.{:-)
| http://www-csli.stanford.edu/~nunberg/nucular.html
|
| Sue...
|
--
Significant Zero E-field = Electric field, M-field =Magnetic field, two
unbound field effects
http://home.freeuk.com/paulps/
Maybe updates. (1-(1/(1/3))^2)/(1 + (1/(1/3))^2) = - 0.08 = FTL ? -p<+p or
(m*-v)<(m*+v) or (m*-c^2)<(m*+c^2) =g?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- References:
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: Significant Zero
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- From: sue jahn
- Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- Next by Date: Re: GR ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- Next by thread: Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading