Re: GR ?
- From: "Significant Zero" <paulpsremove@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:54:28 +0100
"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wH0Ae.2598$0w2.964@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Significant Zero wrote:
| > Would anybody that understands GR dispute the statement that the
geometry of
| > GR is non-Euclidean due deformation of length and duration under
presence
| > of mass and that this deformation has the aspect and equivalence to
energy?
|
| You have too many unacknowledged puns in there for your statement to
| make sense (e.g. on "deformation", "length", "duration", ...). And there
| are undefined phrases in there, too ("deformation of length and
| duration", "presence of mass", "aspect and equivalence to energy").
Thanks for the reply Tom but would it not be more constructive and useful to
ask me what I mean if you don't understand ? Also is it necessary to so over
complicate something as to make any determination about it impossible.
|
| In GR there is a definite relationship between the metric of spacetime
| and the energy-momentum tensor of matter. The metric determines the
| geometry, and the energy-momentum tensor is the density of mass, energy,
| and momentum in spacetime.
I think these statements indicate an incorrect conceptualisation of the
physical facts behind the theory.
| But note there are manifolds in GR that have
| curvature but no mass (e.g. the electrovacuum manifolds, the
| gravitational-wave manifolds, the geon manifolds, etc.).
As far as I understand it these manifold are not fully experimentally
confirmed.
|
| I think your statement is headed in the right direction, but is phrased
| too poorly to know for sure.
|
| As J.A.Wheeler said, "Space tells matter how to move, and matter tells
| space how to curve." But like most sound bites this is not a precise
| statement of GR.
|
|
| Tom Roberts tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Next by Date: Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
- Previous by thread: Re: GR ?
- Next by thread: Re: GR ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading