Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: stevendaryl3016@xxxxxxxxx (Daryl McCullough)
- Date: 11 Jul 2005 03:43:58 -0700
Androcles says...
>"YBM" <ybmess@xxxxxxxx> wrote
>> Androcles a écrit :
>>> Of course I haven't, there is no t = -1.
>>
>> As well as there is no word spelled "y e s
>> t e r d a y" in english ?
>
>Go back to yesterday then
You seem to be assuming
If vector V exists, then
it is possible to travel
in the direction of V.
(Or rather, it's contrapositive: If it is not possible
to travel in the direction of V, then V does not exist.)
Why do you assume that?
--
Daryl Mc
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- References:
- Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: john_doe_ph_d
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: YBM
- Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- From: Androcles
- Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Prev by Date: Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- Next by Date: Re: Electo London Gravity ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Next by thread: Re: Question about light clock and derivation of time dilation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
